Why is this allowed
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
Some hack puts uninspired pseudo intellectual lyrics to repetitive uninteresting chords and twenty years later want to be intellectuals are still circlejerking over it.
Will music ever be good again?
Can it ever be good again with people going around shilling absolute garbage like this?
edgy
>implying anyone thinks this album is anything other than a meme
music as an art form is overrated and is just derivative of pavement
Even worse, it's about a dead jew.
idk man thats a pretty awesome album imo
>>63847490
>>63847470
>>63847476
>>63847490
>>63847498
>>63847504
This board is rivaling /b/ in terms of cancer, impressive
>>63847504
>dead
Jeff built a time machine and saved her, moron.
>>63847470
>>63847476
>>63847490
>>63847498
>>63847504
>>63847520
>>63847529
>>63847533
>>63847538
Welcome to neo-/mu/ everyone
>>63847520
Depends on how you like it. I can enjoy watching some shitty anime like say SAO, but I'm never going to say its good.
>>63847554
I'm here since 2009 actually.
Contrary to popular belief nobody simply grows out of shitposting.
>>63847561
Music, like a lot of things, is entirely subjective.
>>63847561
just get out freak
>watches anime
>dares to raise his head above the parapet ever
you're a literal degenerate
>>63847576
>he doesn't know the neo/mu/ meme
Hello neo/mu/!
>>63847533
>>63847554
>implying this has ever been any different
here is your post
>>63847576
>Contrary to popular belief nobody simply grows out of shitposting.
true
it's a good album but mu turns good albums into jokes and joke albums into classics
and that pavement comment was just from an article from The Onion about pitchfork
http://www.theonion.com/article/pitchfork-gives-music-68-2278
>>63847583
Indeed, however the amount of praise this album gets is entirely unwarranted. I would say we can look at certain works of arts say Beethoven's 9'th or perhaps the Mona Lisa and say that they are enduring, important and something that as a culture we, at least as a whole respect and recognize the value of. Placing this crappy album on that level is what I'm arguing is wrong. This isn't some timeless masterpiece. This is some crappy pseudo intellectual garbage that should have been dropped as soon as some other crappy bit of pseudo intellectual garbage came around to circlejerk about.
>>63847554
Somebody disagree's with my opinion. Better call them a newfag instead of defending it.
>>63847632
why do you say it's pseudo intellectual? i really don't think jeff mangum was trying to trick people into thinking he was smart the lyrics are just a little abstract
The only reason this album is still talked about...hell, the reason it became a /mu/ meme is that absurdly high Pitchfork score.
You literally can't prove me wrong
>>63847696
this
>>63847687
It was written so people would sit around writing more about it. It purposefully says little so critics and pseudo intellectuals would have a field day talking about getting it attention it neither warranted or deserved.
>>63847470
Agreed
>>63847476
What a lazy repsonse, faggot
>>63847741
it's just that easy
i'm gunna write an album with some abstract lyrics and immediately get my pitchfork 10, there's nothing else to it xD
>>63847696
you know pitchfork originally gave it an 8.7, right?
it wasn't until it became a loved "underground" album that they changed it to a 10
>>63847794
the 10 came up in 2005 though, way before /mu/ existed
this board was even more obsessed with p4k back in the day, that's the only reason this album got so much attention
>>63847632
there's nothing of substance in this shitpost
>le indeed (classy!!)
>the album is bad, it gets too much press
prove it
>beethoven and leonardo are good
okay
>but this isn't
prove it
>saying this album is good is wrong
prove it
>isn't a timeless masterpiece
prove it
>crappy pseudo blah blah
"here are my hot opinions, also facts"
>everyone should forget about it
again, your opinions
there's not a single qualifier in this woat post, it's just you vigorously shitting everywhere, not ONE "point" is justified or backed up with anything
"i think it's shit" would have done the exact same as your post and you wouldn't have looked retarded
>>63847741
if anything it's the opposite jeff mangum had a nervous breakdown in part because of people constantly questioning him about his lyrics
burn this fucking board with fire
>>63847621
Shush! the only reason half of us still listen to music is we think p4k doesn't approve.
>>63847470
Why are contrarians like you allowed to spout utter bullshit so willingly here? Because you have the freedom to do so. Now fuck off.
>>63847498
pavement are illogical tho
