>tfw we'll never be as smart as /lit/ or /sci/
Music is a shitty, stupid field.
I'm sorry for ruining your shitty bait thread buddy but I've been waiting all day to do this
check em
books and science are all objective.
music is subjective, how can you be smart if people like and agree on completely different things?
Having a passion for music /= stupid
For /sci/ it's obvious, most people who go there have degrees in their fields (or are working on it) so their discussion are based on some knowledge.
But I'll never understand the "/lit/ is good" meme, using longer words to sound intelligent doesn't mean you are. Maybe they have a longer attention span than music listeners but that's about it.
>>63613234
>books are objective.
Dude.
/sci/ is full of literal retards pretending to be smart. /lit/ isn't bad though
>>63613202
We have our Literary and Scientific equivalents you poptimist moron
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUVNtDxlTP8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yk717tZzKkk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apzSvM6Esdc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXQ2-uD_4LU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEY9lmCZbIc
>>63613285
Said like a faggot that doesn't read books.
/mu/ is shit
/sci/ and /lit/ aren't filled with le epic ironic filthy frank memers like this board is.
>>63613353
no it's not
>/lit/
>smart
nice meme, you faggots ruined /lit/ and now is just a bunch of memes, can't wait for the epic spongebob memes.
I used to browse /sci/ but quit a long time ago because it descended to a load of high schoolers pretending they knew about string theory, it's a shit-tier board
/sci/ and /lit/ are far worse than /mu/. They have even more pseudointellectual memers than we do, and that's a very impressive feat.
>4chan
>smart
It's just a big hugbox of neets
>/lit/
dude infinite jest
all three boards are shit in different ways
/mu/ is just the most shit because music is the artistic lowest common denominator, and people know that a lot of "dank memes: come from here so they flock in droves
all of 4chan is trash, and yet here i am
/lit/ made me read Infinite Jest
fuck them
>>63613864
Goddamn are we really the most shit? I thought music was fucking hard to make... that depresses me to end
>science and literature doesn't affect music
lol what
have you heard of audio physics
have you heard of philosophy in relation to music
>>63613202
>/lit/ or /sci/
>smart
kek looks like you browsed there for 10 minutes
>>63613892
>pretending to have read it
:^)
>>63613202
>/lit/
>smart
M8, I do critical and academic writing for a living. /lit/ is quite literally a board full of high school-level analysis and pseudointellectualism, with a healthy measure of /v/-tier groupthink and contrarianism. They don't judge literary works on any remotely objective factors. They judge it based purely on what they think will score them the most smartie points among the other board users.
/mu/ is prone to some of the same behaviours, but it still manages to be a cut above /lit/, however slightly so.
>>63614155
>/lit/ is quite literally a board full of high school-level analysis and pseudointellectualism, with a healthy measure of /v/-tier groupthink and contrarianism. They don't judge literary works on any remotely objective factors. They judge it based purely on what they think will score them the most smartie points among the other board users.
I don't go on /lit/ but that perfectly describes /mu/
t. Professional musician for 10 years
>>63614210
Trust me senpai, /lit/ is so much worse for it. Like I say, we're prone to some of the same behaviours here, but pretentious would-be literary critics are so, so much worse than pretentious would-be music critics.
I have a PhD, i'm a smart guy and I can tell you music is far from being a stupid field.
ever since the influx of redditors on /lit/ its become pretty bad.
also the brazilians that read english novels translated to portuguese need to leave
>>63614026
I read most of it :C more than enough to not like it.
