Sorry, I forgot the thread title. It's "Talentless Hacks."

>le velvet underground man vs the most iconic solo artist in all of rock music

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

File: bowie-pilate.jpg (77 KB, 500x479) Image search: [Google]

77 KB, 500x479

We all know Bowie was on top

>>63565291
Obviously Bowie. Is this even a question?

>actual talented musician/singer/songwriter who was part of the velvet underground, objectively the most influential and experimental band of all time

vs.

>literal overrated hack more known for his wild appearance than his (lack of) talent at composing or perfoming. a trendhopper who basically ripped off other shit that was going on around him and watered it down for a mainstream audience, and his few good albums were collabs with more talented musicians like Eno and Mick Ronson.

this is a very easy decision to make

>>63565483
>objectively the most influential and experimental band of all time

nice bait but I think you mean Slint

>>63565504
End yourself.

>>63565504
>90s music
>important to anyone besides generic edgylord SJW reckbeard

>>63565483
(You)

>>63565291
Lou Reed

>>63565483
hey i wrote that pasta

>>63565483
Eno only had like 3 decent albums..

>>63565504
i like slint but they're not even in the same league as tvu (or even bowie) in terms of influence
>>63566079
3 times the amount bowie had

>>63566149
>Ziggy Stardust
>Aladdin Sane
>Low
>"Heroes"
>Scary Monsters (and Super Creeps)
All 7+/10s

I loved Lou but would obviously choose Bowie any day.