Is this the Kind of Blue of rock music?
of music in general
Kind of blue is literally 100 times better than that shit, so no.
>>63454684
meme music
>>63454711
>Kind of blue is literally 100 times better than that shit
Plebs actually believe this.
No. What does that mean?
>>63454711
objectibly wrong
More like Kind of Bad amirite xD
>>63454684
more like the Black Saint.
>>63454816
>>63454761
How can you find beefheart to be better than davis?
I can sit in my chair and relax to kind of blue whilst sipping red, but if i did the same with beefheart I'd feel like I was in some demented childs playground which is obviously NOT relaxing.
>>63454976
>music has to be relaxing to be good
why
>>63454684
this is the shit of shit music
>>63454976
Jesus that's a shit argument, and I was agreeing with you too. You blew it faggot.
I CANNOT GO BACK TO YER FROWNLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAND
>>63455520
Ok, replace red with beer or whatever you kids drink. Either way, it's impossible to enjoy beefheart on anything but psychedelics, and even then it'd be terrifying.
>>63455611
>It's impossible to enjoy Beefheart on anything but psychedelics
Just because you don't like it doesn't mean that everyone who enjoys it is on drugs, or whatever you're trying to imply.
It's a Frank Zappa ripoff
>>63454684
Kind of Blue is like an introduction into the emotions and textures of jazz
No one would use TMR as an introduction into rock music
It's the 'Shape of Rock to Come'
>>63456265
so you're saying it's the Moanin' of rock. then which Zappa is the Kind of Blue?
>>63456302
Why would you use Kind of Blue as an introduction to jazz? Do you expect a new listener to have any idea what they're doing and why it's the most important jazz record of all time if that's the first one they ever hear? For that matter, who the hell uses words like 'emotions' and 'textures' to describe music? Is that why people seem to despise Trout Mask Replica? Because they have no idea what music is?
>>63454684
It's not. Kind of Blue is a better album. I still like that album though.
>>63454684
>kind of shit
>>63456408
>For that matter, who the hell uses words like 'emotions' and 'textures' to describe music?
kind of like everyone
and it was my introduction so I was just basing from personal experience
>>63454761
>>63454816
You're right, it's literally 500 times better than that shit
>>63456484
>kind of like everyone
Oh no wonder Radiohead has the #1 rated album on RYM and people unironically value Melonhead's opinion.
>>63456519
i'm struggling to see what you're getting at, should music not be described in terms of emotion or texture? It's not like those are the only ways
>>63454684
It didn't introduce modal scales to rock so no. It's not Kind Of Blue of rock music.
>>63454684
It's more like the Bitches Brew of rock music
>>63456604
You see, a sound in its most basic form can be drawn as a sine wave, entering and exiting a point at a constant rate. We call this rate the frequency, and we measure it in Hz after the scientist Rudolf Hertz. A sound wave at a frequency of 440Hz is what we call 'concert pitch', or A.
>>63454711
This
>>63454684
It's more like the Love Supreme of rock music
Fast and bulbous, that's right, the mascara snake
Fast and bulbous, also a tin teardrop
Bulbous, also tapered, that's right
>>63455611
beefheart on psychedelics will make you have a fucking panic attack never do that shit
its cool
>>63456347
How is Moanin' a rip off of Kind of Blue? Not only is it like a completely different sort of record but it was recorded before Kind of Blue was.
>>63459472
Melonheads don't listen to jazz. Why do you think there exists people who so lividly hate this album?
