I don't get it, I like this album a lot, but I just don't get why it's considered as legendary as it is.
Why did you make this thread again?
>>63358029
Th-this is the first time i've made this thread though
>>63358117
Huh, funny. Pretty much this exact same thread was up a few hours ago.
Actually it is still up
>>63355137
>>63358168
Huh, That's funny, I guess I should've checked the catalog first. That's an odd coincidence.
if you don't get it you're not knowledgeable about music or you don't have good taste, or both.
>barroque chords
>one thousand voices
>avant-garde lyrics
>tons of textures
1966.
>>63359369
this, plus the amount of musicianship and time and effort put into the album. Thats what makes it legendary
>>63357953
read the wiki article on it. I'm not going into detail about everything that makes it unique.
sunflower is better t͏bh f͏am
>>63357953
Probably because there was nothing like it in popular music when it was released. Pet Sounds made a good case that a pop album can be a work of high art.
Teenagers think Pet Sounds is some kind of experimental emotional masterpiece when really it's just The Beatles 2 Faggotronic Boogaloo
I'm 28 years old, I'm probably older than the majority of people on /mu/. I've studied music theory in college for five years. I play more than five instruments including guitar and violin. I'm part if a rock duo and I perform monthly at various places. We've been working on an album since 2014. I think I know what I'm talking about.
To all you Pet Sounds fags, how much music theory do you know? What instruments do you play? I'm guessing none.
>>63359695
Try harder.
>>63359695
>I've studied music theory in college for five years.
>>63359695
you don't have to play to understand and appreciate music
