Even though the other Beatles were great, they were shit compared to McCartney. Why was he so incredible?
Temporary Secretary reveals McCarney's complete musical genius
paul was shit compared to lennon tbqh
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUMFp0F6mp0
>>63334817
>x beatle is best beatle
it's not the 60s/70s anymore, no one cares, you don't need to choose sides
I unironically love Wings
Morse Moose and the Grey Goose is extremely underrated
>>63335035
Biker Like an Icon shows how much he needs John.
>>63334817
he was the best singer, a great songwriter and has the best solo work. ram is absolutely god tier
>>63335156
that whole album is
well he got two chances to be great...
>>63335136
This desu
>>63334817
I think Paul had the best voice and could make the best melodies
also he probably had the highest average best song. lennon had a lot of great ones but he also had some dumb shit that brings his 'rating' down
george is george and ATMP is the best beatles solo album but you can't really put george into the debate about the beatles because it's all paul and john
>>63334817
Unlike Lennon he never lost his pop sensibilities
>>63335284
Absolutely
>>63335338
the exact opposite of this tbqh
>mcartney had Martha My Dear,
>Honey Pie,
>Birthday,
>Getting Better,
>Obla Di Obla Da.
i really don't see how you can have a shittier song catalog than that.
>>63334817
Why listen to Mccartney when Brian Wilson exits? Literally anything of note mccartney has ever done has been a wilson ripoff.
