Pop Sensibility or Lyrical Credibility?
Your choice /mu/
>implying
>Wouldn't be called the BEATles without the beat teebee-h famn
All George, all the time.
>>63148184
Paul McCartney, in every imaginable category.
John was a better lyricist, but Paul's pop sensibilities are more impressive than John's lyrics.
John lennon is dead paul is far superior
Ever since I learned Paul was the main creative force behind Abby Road, he's obviously the superior Beatle
>>63149235
Even after Maxwell's Silver Hammer?
Enjoy your inane granny shit.
>>63148184
John how is that even a question? Paul was the main creative force behind the album Let it Be. John was the main creative force behind Magical Mystery Tour and Sgt Peppers. It's not even a question.
>>63148184
>people thinking John didn't have great pop sensibility like mccartney
listen to "If I Fell" plebs
>>63149251
thanks John
>>63149498
Are you retarded? Sgt. Peppers and Magical Mystery Tour are the two most influenced by Paul projects the Beatles ever did. The others had little say in their production.
>>63149608
>Sgt. Peppers and Magical Mystery Tour are the two most influenced by Paul projects the Beatles ever did. The others had little say in their production.
Yet the best songs on them were John songs...
>>63149654
He had like 5 songs between the two.
>Good Morning, Good Morning
lol
>>63149578
Actually, this is George. We both thought that song was pointless, and doing it over and over again made it insipid.
Fuck you Paul and your fucking hammer and your fucking grandmother songs.
>>63149762
Better than your Indian shit, Georgie boy.
>>63149713
Yeah because overloading shit like When I'm Sixty-Four and the Fool on the Hill make for great listening.
>>63149713
He had 8 or 9. Can you not count?
Their solo careers showed how much they needed each other.
>>63149784
I can play what you want me to play, or I could not play at all, whatever you want, Paul.
>>63149608
He literally added the worst fucking parts to each album, whereas Lennon was responsible for A Day in the Life, Strawberry fields Forever, I am the walrus, Getting Better, BFTBoMK, and Tomorrow Never Knows, Lucy in the Sky Paul contributed...what? the Walrus on the cover? Fixing a hole? Fixing a fucking hole? She's Leaving Home? His songwriting is bland as fuck and all his so called "pop sensibilities" are ripped straight from the tip of Brain Wilson's dick.
>>63149796
>He doesn't like The Fool on the Hill
>>63149713
>With a Little Help, LSD, Mr Kite, A Day in The Life, Walrus, Strawberry Fields
He carried those albums
>>63149864
I will admit however that fool on the hill is a great song. Good Job Paul try copying lennon more often it makes for your best work (S/O to Martha My Dear)
>>63149820
Wings > Beatles
>>63149831
>I post things about bands I know nothing about
>>63148184
fixed your image OP
>>63149910
>I cant refute so i greentext
CLAAAASSSIC paul fan move
>>63149928
Getting Better was 90% Paul, 10% John
>>63149831
Cmon now... Im a John fan but youre being ridiculous. You even named a Paul song to prove your point. Getting Better is Paul. She's Leaving Home is great and Sgt Pepper the track is awesome. There's no 'bland' Beatles anyways. I'll give it to you still, out of John, George and Paul, Paul's my least favorite. Still love him though, his basslines are legendary
>>63149926
kek
>>63148184
The real question is who would win in a fight to the death.
>>63150092
john looks like a killer and paul like a fagit, really now?
>>63150092
John has far more pent up anger and a predilection towards violence. It's no question.
However George could probably knock the shit out of him if he didn't do the whole nonviolence thing.
>>63150092
Bowie
>>63150055
This is true, that was a mistake but John still has the far more impressive catalog of Beatles songs
