Post your decade ratings distribution on RYM so we can decide what the best decade is
ok
>>63110838
Everyone's will be skewed that way because of survivorship bias
>>63110935
I'm about to skew your ass and you better hope you survive
>>63110943
bring it on big boi
>>63110935
whats that
rym reviews
>>63110965
>concentrating on the people or things that "survived" some process and inadvertently overlooking those that did not because of their lack of visibility
no one's going to sit through all the shite that came out in the 60s, they just pick out the classics. we listen to a bunch of crap that came out recently because we're keeping up with new releases
>>63111001
>we listen to a bunch of crap that came out recently because we're keeping up with new releases
I don't do that
>>63111067
I don't either to be honest, I can't really be bothered, but I assumed most people do
>>63111001
this is biased towards things people will see without doing a deep research (that will mostly be current stuff but not always the case).
So this way you can try something without even searching for it.
Thats why all those mainstream artists have alot of ratings, no matter if people liked them or not
>>63110838
your a erage rating is below 3. do you even enjoy music??
>>63110935
this wtf, op is the perfect example
you try more new things because they might be good and they sometimes aren,t but try only at least a bit acclaimed shit from earlier decades because why bother
>>63110838
>80's better than 70's
r u srs
>>63111184
2.16 > 2.13, anon
>>63111180
>you try more new things because they might be good and they sometimes aren,t but try only at least a bit acclaimed shit from earlier decades because why bother
maybe one day you get your own taste anon, keep going strong!
>>63111223
welcome to slash em u slash
enjoy your stay
