how accurate is this?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
how accurate is this?
>>63086120
Not bad
is this an infinite jest footnote?
>>63086884
you didn't change anything in the algorithm
>>63086925
yeah I did, look closer
>>63086954
you made it a bit narrower
>>63086954
they are exactly the same picture aside from the fact that you added a narrow whte strip on the right. I repeat - aside from that they are virtually identical
>>63086884
what??
The musique concrete/electroacoustic collage sections were nice but the flanger got fucking annoying on this album.
>listens to Roy Montgomery once
Dude should ditch the guitar and hone his skill for sampling.
>>63088609
yeah I think so, he plays very randomly
>>63088667
ye there's no contingent through line that it could fall under the free improv/EAC tag either. He's just not as talented as he thinks he is.
Pic unrelated. Beautiful sunrise I saw on my way to class on Monday.
>>63088801
who needs talent?
>>63086120
which album is this?
>>63088863
This guy.
>>63088949
but he actually got a cool guitar
>>63088945
albur 0.02
>>63088994
thanks hun
>>63088801
The only important thing is enoying it, who fuckin care if he is talented or what?
>>63089165
I mean, some substantial musicianship is prereq to random doodling making the final mix on your album and it actually being enjoyable for me.
If that's your thing, you should drive down to your local community college and sit outside the practice rooms.
>>63086120
I can appreciate it, beautiful
On my first listen at the moment.
There are some really nice moments, but they are countered with really bad amateur-tier noodling and "experimentation" that frankly just doesn't work here.
I'll probably need to come back to this though, if this is anything it's certainly interesting.
>>63086925
>>63086983
>>63087057
An easy way to find differences between two pictures is to just put them in two tabs next to each other and switch between them.
Look all the way to the leftmost blocks, and then the bottom of those. He changed the greater-than-or-equal-to into just a greater-than.
Also, I'd just like to ask, what exactly am I looking at? I have a mathematics minor, but never had a set theory class (I am assuming this is set theory; I recognize set theory notation since I'm reading an intro book for it currently).
You won't get it if you don't appreciate music experimentacion
>>63089932
You could expand that by saying, "You won't get it if you don't appreciate bad music experimentacion."
>>63090070
This, for some part.
Like someone posted above, the artist clearly isn't as good at guitar as he thinks he is and his abilities fall short next to his ambitions.
However, I eagerly await to hear more from him once he improves.
I'm not saying the album was bad, there were beautiful moments and it set a nice mood but it didn't follow through exactly. Like I stated above, the really amateurish noodling made some parts really really unenjoyable which was kind of disappointing.
>>63090300
Yeah, (that was me btw) he'll only get better from here. I'll keep an eye on him but because I like where his ambition is set on.
>>63090452
Exactly, there's definitely lots of potential here.
maybe this is not good, but it has a unique sound. Does anyone know something that sounds like that?
>>63090566
Good taste, fäm. What's your last?
>>63090644
(y)/n
>>63090726
>(y)/n
Good answer
>>63090726
I havent got one, sadly. I find it that keeping too much track of my listenings distracts me from actually listening and it just turns more or less into collecting really.
>>63090866
Thanks.
>>63090888
I feel ya. You on Twitter?
This was better desu
