>ITT: Artists with 10/10 discographies
who's gonna start us off?
>>61826146
True
>>61826146
Lol, I love me some Elliott but his discography is not a 10/10. I'd go with Tom Waits.
anyone gonna start?
What constitutes a 10/10 discography? Cuz like if it's about consistency yeah I would probably give it to Elliott he hasn't had a single bad release. But if it's about the sheer number of great releases then I would probably give it to Swans or if I am allowed to bring in non-popular music stuff, Miles Davis.
goldie
not being ironic all of his songs, albums, and dj sets are bangin'
>>61826311
fucked bjork
>>61826146
>
>>61826146
No one has a 10/10 discography.
>>61826350
That's his best album along with Roman Candle btw
yeah goldie's shit is tight even his mixes
f(x)
>>61826350
>implying figure 8 is bad
>>61826370
Da truth.
the obvious one
>>61826146
wrong,he's got 100000000/10 discographies
>>61827385
that came out weird...
his disc is 10000000/10
no debate
>>61826146
all the way
>>61826146
XO and especially Figure 8 impinge pretty heavily on this.
Swans
Genre hops so much but they succeed every time
>>61826146
Fugazi.
>>61827246
s/t was okay
>>61827458
def
>>61826191
>>61826299
>>61827458
>>61827598
>>61827614
these.
Also AnCo. Nobody will agree with me on that one, but every album of theirs absolutely does it for me.
The avalanches
>>61827565
>having a shitload of free time to hear all his releases
Nah son
>>61828025
>>61827868
These and probably Eno
>>61827907
hah well, yeah
>>61826662
rufus...
>>61827598
>The Burning World
>My Father Will Guide Me
>10/10
Family please
>>61827828
all of the good things he's done far outweigh that slight bad thing
>>61826146
With or without comps included
>>61826146
>>61826191
>>61826228
>>61826299
>>61826311
>>61826350
>>61826662
>>61827246
>>61827458
>>61827543
>>61827589
>>61827598
>>61827614
>>61828025
>>61828375
Absolutley not. 10/10 Discographies mean that they don't have a single song that's even less than great. Every single one of these artists have put out a mediocre album, so they're not even close to 10/10.
Only other artist other than pic related would be Blind Willie Johnson or >>61827907 if you don't count EPs and unreleased stuff.
>>61826176
>>61826163
OP did
>>61828463
>out of step
>even a 6/10
Lmao good one
>>61828597
They're seriously one of two artists that are 10/10 imo. It's really only because they have a discography under 45 minutes that this is even possible. Same with Blind Willie Johnson. I'll bet if they released even a few more songs it would probably move down to a 9/10.
I love Elliott Smith, but how someone can say his discography is a 10/10 is beyond me. Maybe they're still in high school?
>>61828694
>Maybe they're still in high school?
>thinks Minor Threat is a 10/10
>>61828732
A true legend, why isn't he more appreciated on /mu/?
>>61828771
What artist has a 10/10 in your opinion then, buddy?
>>61828799
>>61828732
lmao
>>61828732
>Listened to So 50 or more times
>Still think this is a picture of Rob Lowe every time I see it
>>61828810
There isn't a artist with a 10/10, the ones that get near it are Unwound, This Heat and maybe Portishead. But really, Minor Threat? REALLY? They are mediocre as fuck and every other Ian MacKaye project was better.
>>61828936
>Portishead
>This Heat
>Unwound
None of those artists have even released a 7/10, my guy.
I don't even like the Smiths that much but I can admit they have a 10/10 discography. Only weak link would be oscillating wildly.
I'd also say Bedhead, definitely. Slint as well. And maybe Shabazz Palaces and Iceage so far but who knows.
>>61828936
Agree on TH and I'd second Portishead, forgot about them. Were it not for half of the Anika album I'd go and nominate the whole of Geoff's discography too
>>61829015
>>61828375
The Queen is Dead would probably be a 10/10 if it were a track shorter. Same with Hatful of Hollow if it were 3 or so tracks shorter.
But otherwise, not even close.
>>61828997
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Did you get mad because someone said that Minor Threat was shit?
Embrace was 10 times better
Fugazi was 100 times better
Can't you discuss with arguments? Or you only have dank memes?
This Heat and Unwound had a streak of almost perfect albums, experimental but enjoyable. Portishead had a lot of good releases (the self-titled was a bit mediocre) but the quality remained high, while Minor Threat was just derivative overrated hardcore punk.
Turn off your trip until you graduate from high school, senpai.
>>61829086
eh i guess. I do think Minor Threat is a good candidate but a 10/10 discog ends up being conceivable only of short lived bands.
>>61829129
This anger. It fuels me.
Unwound is ass. Their first and last albums are their only salvageable ones. This Heat is alright as well, but nothing really amazing. Portishead has nothing that's good.
>Says I'm in high school
>Gets filtered for saying "senpai"
>>61829187
Agreed, my guy.
>>61829234
>Unwound is ass. Their first and last albums are their only salvageable ones.
Filtered because pleb trip.
>>61829129
>Calls someone angry
>While typing in all capital letters on an Anime forum on the Internet
I don't like Minor Threat either, but none of those bands are special at all.
It's a 7/10 band versus 3 5/10s.
>>61829234
Unwound is ass but saying Dummy isn't a least a good album proves you know nothing about music
>>61829452
>say someone knows nothing about music because they dislike a very popular album album
wew
>>61826146
That's impossible, unless you only release one stellar album, like Jeff Buckley.
>>61828463
Bjork never released a mediocre album, also the way i see it is that the discography as a whole is a incredible, not necessarily that every song is perfect just like how when I rate an album 10/10 I still have songs that I think are better than others, if I am to go by your criteria then there is absolutely no 10/10 discographies especially not minor threats
>>61829491
You are the shit version of Afternoon Lad.
Fuck off to /b/.
>>61829491
>because it's popular it's bad
>because I don't like it means it's not a good album
Holy shit. End yourself
>>61829515
That's fair
>>61829537
>The shit version of shit
So I'm gr8? Thanks!
>>61829543
>because I don't like it means it's not a good album
Yes. How much I enjoy an album is how I determine if it's good. What else would I base it on? If Rolling Stone or Fantano likes it? Figures.
>>61829515
I get your perspective and would agree but Volta kills it for me, completely. Only release I can't 100% respect
Still nominating Bedhead and Slint tho
>>61829625
I feel like thats fair, I do love volta but i figure im pretty biased haha
>>61829543
Okay, I'm going to ask this again because I am legitimately curious about this:
If I'm not supposed to judge an album's quality on how much I like it, then what am I supposed to base it on? Is there an objective "goodness" found in music, and how does one find this? Do you just copy your opinions from p4k and Fantano? Do you dislike good albums?
Please respond. I'm really not trying to be an ass, I am just super curious about this statement.
>>61829782
I'm curious about what you have against Peter Gabriel. I take it your a Phil Collins Genesis Fan?
>>61829782
You base it on what you think is good but you can recognize the influence of something that you don't like personally, just like what is appealing to you
Even their first ep was pretty good, all their albums are 8 or higher imo
>>61826176
rekt
>>61829801
I like Selling England by the Pound and the sick drums on In the Air Tonight, but otherwise, not really.
I listened to So once or twice, but wasn't really captivated by it. Maybe I'll pick it up again some day.
>>61829850
I recognize the influence of a lot of popular "indie" acts like Wilco and Pavement, but think they suck. Same with a lot of influencial acts like Chuck Berry, Stones, Led Zeppelin, and Bruce Springsteen, but I still think they suck.
Are you saying if I hate an artist's music, I still have to like them because a lot of people like them? Would you call this delusion?
Nick Drake
Absolutely patrician.
>>61829926
they look like they really love heroin and being cynical about obscure things.
>>61829850
>>61829938
I wasn't really clear there. What I'm saying is
Goodness of album = How much you like album
And nothing else at all. An album is not good by being influential.
>>61829954
Maybe this, actually.
>>61829938
I can understand that. Try Peter's first 4 albums then. They have some good, strong work in them. Especially his third and fourth albums "Melt" and "Security"
>>61829926
Seconded. Hopefully they don't fuck it up
>>61829954
oh how i wish. but definitely not. or maybe it's Pink Moon's unreachable quality clouding my judgement of the rest of his work
>>61829992
Put it in my backlog. Thanks, my guy.
>>61829782
>>61829782
>>61829938
>>61829938
No you dont have to like them but you should be able to understand why other people do but it basically comes down to what is "good" is what you think is good
>>61829988
An album is not good by being influential, youre not wrong but they are important is what im trying to get at
>>61830063
Okay, cool, my guy.
>>61826146
>>61826176
>>61826228
>>61826191
>>61826311
>>61826370
>>61826389
>>61826436
>>61827246
>>61827385
>>61827458
>>61827458
>>61827543
>>61827565
>>61827598
>>61827907
>>61828463
>>61828375
>>61828868
>>61829926
>>61829987
>>61829992
>>61830006
>>61829996
>>61830061
LOL at how all of you think music is something more than perception. Your opinions on music are as credible as goddamn Brian Williams
>>61830106
i think everyone here's pretty aware that these are just personal opinions
>>61830106
*click* *click* *click* *click*
scroll scroll scroll
*click* *click* *click*
you showed them
Sweet Trip's albums are all fantastic, also Nick Drake & Slow Dive
