Any album that features the artist or band on it's cover is mediocre at best.
prove me wrong
Checkmate.
low
>>61825421
>>61825470
OP on fucking suicide watch /thread
the majority of jazz?
>>61825421
Spiderland
What's Going On
1989
Grace
Pet Sounds
The Idiot
The Shape of Punk to Come
good kid, m.A.A.d city
Madvillainy
A Love Supreme
Illmatic
Donuts
Painting With
Be
Pornography
Disintegration
Roman Candle
Either/Or
Small Talk at 125th and Lenox
Numerous Bruce Springsteen albums
All of D'Angelo's albums
Numerous Miles Davis albums
Numerous Beatles albums
Numerous David Bowie albums
>>61825421
ITT: OP gets rekt
Every classical album.
>>61825603
This
>>61825421
ya fucked up, mate
>>61825421
Bottomless Pit
>>61825742
Painting With isn't out yet
>roman candle
That's not Elliott on the cover. Perhaps Figure 8 or Basement on a Hill would be more suitable?
Every Elliott Smith album, familia.
>>61825864
Fuck I meant Figure 8
Lost my train of thought for a sec
>>61825470
well that was fun. nice thread guys
>>61825470
Except for this one and a few that i haven't listened to, i'd argue that most of these don't satisfy the criteria of being better than mediocre.
>>61825603
jazz is literally the reason this even came t my mind
also, basically where i'm going with this is that featuring the artist on the album cover kind of detracts from the quality of the music.
As in, if you come to agree that the album cover is an integral part of how we perceive the music today, having the artist as a cover devalues the experience more often than not.
