Who does /mu/ think is better?
>>61823492
>britpop
who cares?
Blur. By miles.
>>61823492
Pulp
>>61823533
This to be honest lad
>>61823533
this
>>61823523
also this
>>61823492
The Boo Radleys
Kula Shaker
Supergrass.
Also: Pulp.
UB40
>>61823492
Montie here!! oasis is the best of course, im gonna skull fuck my gf now until her teeth rip off my dick
Blur.
Oasis were pretty much the worst britpop band.
As for the best in general for me is a three-way battle the aforementioned Blur, Pulp and Mansun.
>>61823821
And (The) Verve.
I did my GCSE English paper on "Writing to Inform, Instruct and Persuade" about the Battle of the Bands.
I cannot for the life of me remember who I argued in favour of, though.
At the time I would probably have felt blur. But I think peer pressure may have made me say Oasis (I went to state school). Nowadays, I'd say Oasis. Or Supergrass/Pulp/Verve. Or the Manics. Or Suede.
...Charlatans....
>>61823975
>Oasis were pretty much the worst britpop band.
You clearly just don't know very much about britpop.
Blur is better but they dont have to beat much.
>>61823492
Oasis is what I listened to when I just wanted great melodies and optimistic lyrics.
Blur is what I listened to when I wanted to somewhat challenge my ears a bit but still enjoy most of the music. The Magic Whip is one of my favorite Blur albums and it's not even part of the Britpop era.
>>61823492
Oasis are one of the all time greatest.
Liam in track pants on totp straight off the council estate, 19 year old scally singing Live Forever, singing not miming, sorry it's over. Let's face it blur could have been accountants or something. Oasis were real. Rags to riches classic.
Basically Blur has not one song as good as Live Forever. Therefore Oasis. GOAT.
