>Production Resources:
>Pastebin - Links, books, videos, articles, tutorials and stuff
http://pastebin.com/pYGCLu6q
>/prod/ wiki - still looking for contributors (wink, wink, WINK)
http://mu-sic-production.wikia.com
There's a severe lack of DAW descriptions in the wiki. If you're good with your tool of choice, consider writing a paragraph about it.
Learn how you can be an astronought and make space jams.
Remember to use clyp.it to post your tracks/WIP : posting a clyp.it is just providing sound for a question, posting a soundcloud link is making self-advertisement and the thread doesn't need that.
Remember to check other peoples' clyp.it links to keep the thread healthy.
Reposting from last thread
>Is there actually a point to using any of the later MPCs besides workflow? I thought they were 12 bit and lofi, but I was looking up the stats and they are 44.1khz and 16 bit which seems pretty nice.
>>61809850
ableton master race
>>61809940
Are you referring to the standalone devices versus the now just midi controllers?
>>61809940
It's just a matter of workflow and looking cool, no bigger point.
>>61809960
The standalone ones like the 2000, 1000, 3000, ect.
http://youtu.be/nKBrYZ6lKsg
can anyone tell me how i make the sound of the synth that is zipping around at the end end of Boring Angel here? Its like right at the end of this video
>>61810150
probaly some rompler preset with portamento/glide
Is BitWig good for a beginner DAW?
>>61810067
yeah i mean, a lot of the last MPC's haven't felt very special and are all workflow. the MPC Touch is pretty interesting, but that's about it.
>>61810150
sounds like a pretty plain synth with a fuckton of random glide shit. Wouldn't be hard to recreate.
Also /r/synthrecipes
>>61810178
>>61810371
I got a pirated copy of sylenth, should I just be fucking with the portamentos and arps and shit?
https://clyp.it/qnvfgudh
didnt post any clyps in a long time, what do you think of this one?
>>61810684
>https://clyp.it/qnvfgudh
sounds like Nils Frahm senpai. diggin it
>>61810789
thank you, glad to hear that
>>61809940
Mpcfag here
Mpc are 16bit 44.1khz since the 2000, mpc are really good if you care about the groove of your rhythms and beats in general, they sound ok but sequencing old samplers like a s950 or s1000, any vintage smpler actually, is really awesome.
>>61811134
In your opinion is MPC timing real or a placebo?
>>61810269
As good as any.
>>61811290
are you talking about the swing function? that's definitely a real thing
>>61812624
But does it swing better than other swings?
>>61812709
i dunno, never used an mpc or the swing function on anything else
>>61812624
I was talking about stuff like midi jitter
https://clyp.it/tix34xlw
Unfinished snip
