This would be a 10/10 without the whole lo-fi thing, what a waste.
>>61770888
actually without the integral factor of the low fidelity, it would have maybe 1/2 the power
>>61770925
Wrong
>>61770961
Wrong
>>61770888
>>61770888
Actually, no
>>61770981
Right
>>61770888
I don't even think it's that good, but would definitely be worse without the lo-fi element
>>61771027
Right
Op here, what I mean is, just listen to this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Dayas2Q4CY, it's so fucking good but, it's on shitty quality and unfinished.
>>61770925
Wrong
Good intellectual debate going on ITT
It's an 8/10. Anything would sound better if recorded and mastered properly, that's an objective fact. But nothing's gonna change the fact that he recorded it on an extremely low budget. The album should be appreciated for its content
>>61770888
This would be 10/10 without the whole lo-IQ thing, what a waste.
>>61771059
wrong
