Where do you download your music
through legal channels only
lol I don't download music like a faggot. I find nice used vinyls at my local record shop. The selection is better there anyway. Why would you even download crappy digital files when a record sounds better and has nicer art to begin with?
>>61578883
hehe
youtube2mp3
>>61578883
> record sounds better
"Better"
Nice opinion. It objectively is lower quality - but I guess if lower quality is "better" to you, enjoy!
>>61578904
>opinion
Then why are so many people buying vinyls now?? The mastering sounds better than the mp3s on CDs, how can you say it's "objectively better"? Plus, I can put on a record with friends and listen through the whole thing. No one does that with digital music.
>>61578846
I listen through legal ways such as Spotify, officer.
>>61578846
I liked this cat before I googled it and realised it was a reddit meme
>>61578947
>mp3s on cds
lmao
>>61578947
I said it's objectively higher quality, not objectively better. Totally different. I use vinyls too, faggot. But digital can have 0 quality loss and is objectively better quality than vinyl.
>>61578976
???
>>61579001
According to who? There are a lot of people that disagree with that. There's definitely no quality loss on a vinyl, what are you talking about it's what the artist wanted you to hear
>>61579001
what is quality?
>>61579018
the digital files on a cd are not mp3s you buffoon
>>61579042
Then why do they sound so bad compared to vinyls?
rbt.asia
>>61579053
placebo effect
what.cd like everyone else
>>61579053
placebo effect broseph
>connect an audio cable from the headphone jack to the microphone jack
>look up songs on youtube
>record in audacity
don't use youtube to mp3, its lower quality because of the video to audio transcoding
>>61579097
There'd still be transcoding with your method, though. Or am I being trolled?
>>61579018
> there is no quality loss on my piece of plastic that is played by scratching a needle on it
>>>/Reddit/
>>61578947
I can't take a record player and vinyls with me in my pocket so I think I'll just stick to 320 kbps mp3s
>>61579122
How would there be transcoding, you're directly recording the sound
If you just mean youtubes transcoding, thats why you set it to 1080p so its in flac
>>61579152
> MP3
> not FLAC
>>61579168
This is the most retarded thing I've ever read.
>>61579192
I'm sorry you cant understand simple audio encoding technology
>>61579205
> YouTube
> FLAC
Nice troll, you fuck.
>>61579243
Don't listen to this RIAA shill
>>61579168
>>61579205
What do you export the files to after you record them? Also, video quality has no bearing on audio quality, it's 128 mp4 no matter what.
>>61579272
flac, obviously
>>61578846
Post more kot and I will tell you
>>61579287
Someone out there cannot seriously be saving files from YouTube as FLACs.
>>61579205
>recording
could be digital or analog
>mastering
digital or analog
>encoding (if physical media)
digital or analog
Do I have that right?
If any step along that process is digital, does an analog physical media even matter? Isn't the purity of sound lost at that point?
>>61579287
Okay yeah weak bait fuck off loser
>>61578902
>2016
>still listening to MP3s when WAVs are available on bandcamp
>not AT LEAST getting songs in AAC
oh god
Rutracker
>>61579308
Some of it might be lost but other than having an analog source its the best you're going to get
can you idiots stop getting baited about flac
>>61579348
>>61579322
>he took a meme seriously
>>61579416
Its just basic logic, I don't see how this isn't completely intuitive to you
SoulSeek
>>61579436
>analog to digital:
every vibration is absorbed by magnetic tape, then compressed into tiny digital chunks
>digital to analog
sound starts out as tiny digital chunks, it gets pressed into vinyl or a cassette, your ear hears the tiny digital chunks
Assuming the process for digital encoding is as is the same compression rate as digital recording. Your ears should hear the same thing.
Sorry to burst your bubble.
>>61578902
sameme
>>61578947
mastering can be completely fucked on newer releases of records mane
Holy fuck you retards.
The audio on Youtube is in some weird format or codec called DASH
Youtube2Mp3 transcodes it to mp3
Recording it with Audacity involves no transcoding, just the pure sound from youtube which you can save as a WAV/FLAC
>>61579168
TRANS
>>61578904
vinyl is not "objectively lower quality" it's actually the complete opposite. you sounds like an idiot
>>61579989
>Recording it with Audacity involves no transcoding, just the pure sound from youtube which you can save as a WAV/FLAC
Holy fuck how retarded this is.
First of all, youtube player has to transcode DASH to wav for playback so there IS transcoding. And second of all, not only do you risk quality loss because you're converting digital to analog and then back from analog to digital, you also risk quality loss because recording with audacity is NOT FUCKING THREAD SAFE! Just get a spike in CPU usage that causes youtube to lag and you will get that fucking lag in your recording.
Explain to me: Why not just download the DASH audio contained in webm or mp4 from youtube directly (pic related) and then digitally convert it into wav/flac, instead of capturing the wav that the youtube player transcodes from DASH and risking all the shit I mentioned above?
> there are people in this thread that don't realize YouTube is 128kb garbage
> there are people in this thread that think vinyl is better than FLAC
> .i mi na djuno lo du'u mu'i ma do na morsi
>>61581656
>>61582286
riaa shills
