/classical/
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
post some stuff
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcxafJPjvnI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10F3IxZkoCs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3Xehs1rHfM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arfYFtc7hlw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0VHHFzTa98
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WX150l3LjjM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlPrcvfbLS0
Who are the 20th century's best composers?
>>61470961
Schoenberg, Bartók, Shostakovich, Feldman, Stravinsky, Schulhoff, Prokofiev, Webern, Berg, Boulez, Stockhausen, Antheil, Varèse, Nono, Ives
>>61470961
also Messiaen, Schnittke, Nielsen, Scriabin, Janáček, Krenek, Ravel, Takemitsu
>All download links will be changed to uploaded.net at 15.01.2016
#hype
>>61471114
>>61471273
Basically these
Artyomov is also great, as well as some of the American composers which combined jazz and classical elements
>>61470929
http://strawpoll.me/6443989
>>61471114
>>61471273
>Stockhausen
>Schnittke
Fuck off poly.
>>61471545
not poly, I don't think poly listens to much stockhausen. also, he would've posted Martinů and probably some spectral composers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRXQpoI__Qc
Can anyone reccomend any contemporary classical to a pleb? Preferably like solo piano or very small arrangements. More experimental or avant garde stuff welcome as well. I've really been digging rivers and streams by lubomyr melnyk as of late
>>61470961
Richard Strauss.
Where do I start with Charles Ives?
>>61471911
Decoration Day.
>>61470929
Don't forget the links OP.
https://mega.co.nz/#F!mMYGhBgY!Ee_a6DJvLJRGej-9GBqi0A
https://mega.co.nz/#F!lIh3GRpY!piUs-QdhZACFt2hGtX39Rw
https://mega.co.nz/#F!Y8pXlJ7L!RzSeyGemu6QdvYzlfKs67w
https://mega.co.nz/#F!kMpkFSzL!diCUavpSn9B-pr-MfKnKdA
https://mega.nz/#F!ekBFiCLD!spgz8Ij5G0SRH2JjXpnjLg
https://mega.co.nz/#F!4EVlnJrB!PRjPFC0vB2UT1vrBHAlHlw
https://mega.co.nz/#F!ygImCRjS!1C9L77tCcZGQRF6UVXa-dA
https://mega.co.nz/#F!il5yBShJ!WPT0v8GwCAFdOaTYOLDA1g
https://mega.co.nz/#F!DdJWUBBK!BeGdGaiAqdLy9SBZjCHjCw
http://crudblud.sjm.so/
>SDF gone again
>we're already dead
rip /classical/ [100]
I've been wondering what piano conerti does /classical/ consider good? I've only heard Mozart's and Beethoven's concerti (really loved Mozart's) so far and I wanted to broaden my horizons.
>>61474012
Schoenberg's
Bartók's
Chopin's
Schumann's
Liszt's
Ravel's
Prokofiev's
Any /psychedelic/ users here? What do you like? I'm looking for recs.
>>61471273
>>61474578
*tips fedora*
>>61474842
>listens to classical music
>>61471273
>Takemitsu
Leave.
>>61474870
>implying
>>61471114
Add Mahler
Best ever.
>>61474578
BACH. perfect for understanding the fractal beauty of the universe.
>>61474989
you think takemitsu is not good?
>>61475128
obviously, he's one of the best composers, but he's usually thought of more in the 19th century.
>>61475169
This
/goldenage of music
>>61475255
He died young. His prime was right around the start of the 20th, with him conducting like crazy, and composing most of his music. His music is definately not representative of the 19th century. His music gained great popularity in the late 20th century, his music is of the 20th.
>>61471114
>Stockhausen
WHAT STOCKHAUSEN DID FOR ELECTRONIC MUSIC:
- Wrote banal chamber pieces featuring electronic instruments vaguely exploring acoustic space
- Did some really crappy generative pieces
- Made a slightly more scientific version of Messiaen's shit.
PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY MATTERED:
>Pierre Schaeffer
The grandfather of electronic music. Pioneered the current dominant thought of thinking of sound objects (Treatise on Musical Objects)
>John Chowning
FM SYNTHESIS.
>Miller Puckette
Created extremely user friendly and commercially viable software.
>Jean-Claude Risset
Waveshaping, FM, invaluable in terms of psychoacoustic research.
>Iannis Xenakis
GRANULAR SYNTHESIS, wrote proper, scientific process pieces.
>Lasse Thoresen
Codified Schaeffers thought into an easily communicateable system for education and realization of electro-acoustic scores.
>Denis Smalley
Early digital synthesis, elaborated on Schaeffer.
>Michel Gerzon
Ambisonics.
>>61474012
>>61474309 this and Rautavaara, Mozart, Tveitt, Martinu and Yoshimatsu.
>>61475491
you forgot luc ferrari. Stockhausen did a lot of shit with what relatively limited resources there were for electronic music at that time. karlheinz did a bunch of shit with synths and he worked with multi-channel setups in his later pieces.
>ambisonics
literally what
>>61474309
>>61476050
Thanks a lot for all the recs.
>>61474989
What's wrong with Takemitsu?
>>61477012
He's objectively worse than Akutagawa and Yoshimatsu
>>61477277
nuhuh
>>61478448
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bf6aFyMevX0
Listen to this and then try to convince me Takemitsu is better
>>61475169
I wish I could go back in time and suck Tchaikosky's Tzar-tier cock.
>>61475491
Your post has nothing to do with this thread
>>61479519
I have listened to it. I've even posted it here before.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGgrEqYja9M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PYbk_E4Yck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sbhPvtW0vM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOsr8inpRZ4
Akutagawa is more like Shostakovitch while Takemitsu is more like Messiaen. Takemitsu's music is not really as immediately accessible as Shostakovich or Akutagawa, but that doesn't mean it is worse. I suggest you read his scores sometimes, as there are a lot of intricate details.
>>61475169
Pleb detected.
>>61479813
Please never compare Akutagawa to Shostakovich again.
>>61479871
from his wiki:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yasushi_Akutagawa
>"His compositions were influenced by Stravinsky, Shostakovich, Prokofiev and Akira Ifukube."
>>61471114
Ugh, not even Schoenberg likes Schoenberg.
>>61471273
>Messiaen
This is the correct answer.
>mfw plebs underrate Takemitsu and Stockhausen
>>61479931
I don't care who he was influenced by, Shostakovich is fucking garbage. That would be like comparing Ravel to Satie.
Also the Prokofiev influence is the strongest in my opinion.
>>61479988
Dude helicopters lmao.
Will we make it to the morning
link some entry piano stuff with animu girls
>>61481303
wouldnt it be nice
>>61481384
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUGvRzTW2ME
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBN9XmcMVBQ
Sometimes I forget this is a Concerto when I'm listening to it.
>>61479997
>That would be like comparing Ravel to Satie.
Huh?
>>61482677
Comparing a shit composer to a great one.
>>61482934
Satie is the great one, right?
>>61479997
Actually Shostakovic is pretty awesome bruh
>>61470929
a friend of mine does stuff like this :'D tell him dew sent ya
>>61483051 no link needed edition
https://soundcloud.com/christiannellemose/capriccio
>>61482934
You're a bit of a moron, aren't you?
>>61479933
>not even Schoenberg likes Schoenberg.
true
>>61483165
I like his music but his paintings were utter shit
Does anyone here have expirience with Vienna Symphonic Library? For actual classical music I mean. The examples on their page sound amazing.
>>61483270
vienna was the benchmark of art for a long time so no wonder it would be legendary
>>61470961
NaN
>>61475169
literal faggot
>>61484187
>your taste is bad because people in the 19th century said so
This chart is pretty retarded m80
