>>61316559
they were the best emo band

https://youtu.be/2pi1SXCLqys

>>61316559
Lync were better

>>61316611

ill check them out

>>61316559

What tracks do you consider weak specifically? I was always amazed by how unorthodox the track order was on LCW, and I think it's the main reason why I didn't warm up to certain songs.

>album takes a while to get momentum back after the opener
>tracks 6 through 8 are really strong
>out of gas and long distance drunk follow, and feel really similar in that they're down tempo without a lot going on
>this is followed by an extremely violent song
>this is followed by an extremely jammy song
>last two songs have sparse instrumentation and are really slow, then suddenly the last half of the last song gets really fast, then abruptly stops

Anyone else feel like the pacing was the most engaging aspect of the album?

Also, >tfw there will never be a release of To Roads To Go in decent quality. Could've worked after track thirteen.

>>61316682

"shit luck" is the weakest on the album (thats almost obvious),"long distance drunk" is ok," jesus christ is an only child" is cool for novelty but its really weird between "lounge" and "cockroach" and imo should have been either put nearer the other acoustic songs at the end or cut out entirely. "styrofoam boots" im not crazy on but i would keep it just because it works as a closer.

to me the strength of their early albums was in the off-kilter, squawking guitar jams and i would have been really happy with an album that leaned heavier on that angle

>>61316764

I can agree that all of those are weak songs individually (except Styrofoam Boots), and that's basically a song-for-song list of tracks that I feel (or felt) the same way about. The good news is they're fairly short songs.

>>61316682
I always thought Styrofoam Boots and Teeth Like God's Shoeshine should be interchanged

>>61316682
Shit luck is repetitive garbage
and truckers atlas drags on way to long.

>>61317280
You're out of your damn mind.