>30 minute albums
why was this acceptable?
why is it not acceptable anymore? fuck CDs for making everyone shit out 70 minute long albums
>35 minute EP
>>61229071
this
>>61229071
Ikr, and thus raising the cost.
I'd rather have the 4-5 GOOD songs on the album and ignore the filler.
It was primarily because of records.
Since sides to a record are limited to like 21 minutes or something. Bands figured they could make 30 minute albums to save money in the longrun
>>61229071
this
>>61229054
30 minute albums are alright
I cannot stand 60+ minutes albums, i just get the feeling i'll get bored. only made some exceptions for albums like the beatles and lift yr. skinny fists
>>61229092
>filler
Fuck that term, seriously. Who is to say which songs on the album are just there to take up space?
>ramone was a stage name
why did i just realize this. :( thought they were bros
>>61229071
This
It's actually longer than most punk albums anyways.
>>61229054
The Ramons understood that rock n roll is best delivered in short, high-energy bursts.
>>61229130
So did I. I even thought Ween were related at first.
>20 minute albums
Top tier
>11:50 album
>12:08 album
Really great stuff
>10 minute album
Classic
>1:33 patrician length
>4:08:34 album
das it mane
>>61229054
part of their statement. 14-15 songs was a normal number. shorter songs = shorter album. they were going for a stripped-down version of rock music.
40 min is the sweet spot
you can fit about 15 minutes of music on a side of 12" vinyl before the sound quality starts to degrade
>>61229122
>why do people have opinions about shitty songs
>>61230045
>opinions
>shitty songs
Way to contradict yourself.
>>61230063
thinking a song is shitty is an opinion, yes
>>61229368
This. Between 35 and 45 minutes is ok
>>61229054
>75 minute albums
why is this acceptable?
