the only songs scaruffi liked in 2015
haha
>>61200795
it isn't updated yet
canopy of corpse trees
who is scaruffi and why does his taste matter?
Why do you post a screenshot of a pedophile's website OP?
>>61200809
Italian Olympic hiking champion
>>61200809
He's an old fuck with a gigantic ego and weird social views, he wishes he could marry a 12 year old.
He seems to have given up on rock/pop music.
>>61200809
he's an academic who's been involved with Berkeley Stanford and MIT
>>61200809
Some retired Italian plumber. His tastes don't matter, but it's funny to read opinions of Italian ex-plumber pensioners on music.
>>61200809
he's the best taste
they call him the best taste
Find a flaw in Scaruffi's ranking of albums released in the 1990s.
i still really like pomegranates too mr scruffy
>>61200975
Well Oiled is mediocre
the jazz list seems good?
>>61201039
it isn't a meme, he has pretty good taste
>>61200975
>calexico
my pendejo
i completely forgot about I Am A Lake Of Burning Orchids until right now, thanks scruffo
>>61200809
He's some Italian neurophysicist with shit taste in film, decent in music.
In what world is Lost Highway the best work of David Lynch?
>>61200818
There is literally NOTHING wrong with being a pedophile.
>>61201129
sadly you are not doing a meme
>>61201117
Problem is that wasn't even released in 2015, so Scruffy is mistaken. The dude's bandcamp is deleted, but I'm sure that Apart EP was released earlier.
>>61200975
>none of Darkthrone's unholy trilogy
>written in waters doesn't feature
>no vampires of black imperial blood
Complete trash
>>61201175
>metal is good
lol
>>61201149
Seriously though, can you actually provide a valid rebuttal to what Scaruffi said in that think piece?
>>61201238
can't find the article
it's not a terrifically interesting issue desu
>>61201352
>>61201374
>comic sans
>that terrible color scheme
What a piece of shit
>>61201352
If you're not interested in the subject, you should probably refrain from commenting on it in the future. Just my two cents...
>>61201396
You mad, bro?
>>61201422
it's not interesting to talk about it
you're still a sick fuck for bringing it up
>>61201374
>"people got raped in the past"
>"why not today as well"
Scaruffi is so fuckin stupid
>>61201434
Explain why? If you can't, nothing you say is valid.
>>61201374
He's right you know
>>61201464
Where Scaruffi says something about "rape" there?
>>61201479
marrying a 12 year old is rape
he thinks because it happened in the past it's OK today
he is both senile and stupid
>>61201467
the reasons are obvious to anyone I can be bothered talking to
if you don't know why having sex with children is wrong your morality is too fucked for me to be interested in your other opinions
>>61201506
Were you intellectually disabled at 12 years old? If not, you should've been perfectly capable of giving your consent.
>>61201534
>b-because it's w-WRONG OK
Nice argument, senpai.
>>61201558
>12 year olds capable of giving consent
lol
>Nice argument, senpai.
as I said I literally don't care what you think past this point. Some pedophiles exist, and some handicapped pedophile supporters post bullshit like this
it's kind of sad that you're not going to grow out of being stupid, any more
>>61200795
scaruffi generally sucks but at least he sees beyond alive as a great track, which for some reason no one cares for and idk why
>>61201596
I would have fucked a hot 30-year-old woman when I was like eleven, the idea that someone who is going through puberty can't consent at all is ridiculous.
not to say it SHOULD be legal for adults to fuck 12-year-olds but I don't think it's automatically RAPE
>>61201596
>Still hasn't provided a valid rebuttal to anything I've said
Jesus, dude. Stop wasting my time, if you can't defend your opinions.
>>61201623
>he still thinks I care what he thinks
lol
>>61201634
you're embarrassing yourself
>>61200864
Except not in the field of music
I think a decent amount of the things he likes are memes, aka Lisa Germano, Dream Theater etc
But what's more important is what he doesn't like. The things scruffy hates are usually objectively bad, and he's never afraid to say something is shit
>>61201634
>i-i'm not mad I s-swear
>>61201634
Oh, ok so you were just baiting me the whole time? Fair enough.
>>61201649
I am mad...
>>61201656
no, I just told you that you're stupid and you can't convince me of shit once I've established that
...several times by now actually
>>61201374
12 is pushing it, but he's probably right. People in general should be having children at a younger age, I suspect the reason we have so many more tards and shit is because people are wait until they're like 35 to have kids. Unfortunately the way western society is set up, women don't want to drop out and become a mom until they've already established careers.
>>61201700
>and you can't convince me of shit once I've established that
That's because YOU are the stupid one, sir.
>>61201730
>sir
>>61201700
hey everybody look it's scaruffi desperately trying to defend his pedophilia
>>61201430
>double hoverhand
>>61201752
muh reading comprehension
>>61201742
>Can't challenge him intellectually
>B-better resort to memes
>>61201762
lol go back to your cave scaruffi
>>61201770
>I challenge you intellectually
>>61201787
Ok, I guess I'll just take this win and be off. It's been fun, kid.
>>61201806
>I'll just take this win
>>61201806
literally fedora
>>61201730
>defending pedophilia
>"sir"
is this the original fedora man?
he hasn't reviewed many albums this year
>>61201770
>it's been fun, kid
psssh.... nothin personnel
>>61201806
this post
>>61201623
If you want some actual basis from someone else, neurologically we're unable to make completely logical decisions on issues like that before around 18 years old because our prefrontal cortex doesn't fully develop until about then. It's why kids are assholes, their decision making is linked to the amygdala which relies heavily on impulse and emotion. You can google this stuff up in your own time.
fuck is it over? I am having /pol/-tier keks over here and /mu/ is generally an unfunny garbage bin of memes
>>61201806
>Ok, I guess I'll just take this win and be off. It's been fun, kid.
>>61200795
He really likes Sufjan. Surprised there's nothing from Carrie and Lowell there.
>>61200809
He wants to fuck 12-year old children, like half of 4chan.
>>61201905
Not him but (out of curiosity) even if that's the case, what damage would consensual sexual intercourse be capable of doing to a pubescent person?
>>61201742
>>61201787
>>61201815
>>61201867
>>61201883
>>61201926
Holy fuck, /mu/ is genuinely filled with children. I didn't believe the rumors until now.
>>61202015
he just explained why they cannot give consent
>>61202065
I'm 22 so I'm big and clever thx
>>61201918
this is what we get for browsing /mu/ post-2013
>>61202015
I just told you how decision making works in teenagers - it would not be consensual because you have a fully neurologically developed adult asking an undeveloped teenager whose decision-making hinges on impulse and emotion.
>>61202065
>/mu/ is genuinely filled with children
you can not be /mu/ anon, /mu/ isn't only one person
>>61202087
>>61202076
Ok, whatever. But the main point of my question was what actual damage would it do?
>>61202096
Did i imply that it was?
>>61202139
yes
>>61202125
>what actual damage would having sex with someone without consent do?
are you literally asking what is wrong with rape
hey just letting all the pedophiles and pedophile justifiers in this thread know that they can and should end their life at any time
I think you may need to brush up on your reading
comprehension, m8.
>>61202125
Mostly akin to the neurological effects of rape. Anything from phobias to severe mental illness. Scaruffi's argument that "they did it in ye olde times!" were also times we had no grasp on psychology.
>>61202194
meant for >>61202156
>>61202162
Rape and statutory rape are very different things.
>>61202194
*tips fedora*
>>61202226
Ok, more b8.
>>61202224
if you have sex with someone underage without consent then that is both, idiot
>>61202237
BAIDED ;DDDD
>>61201614
>idk why
fantano
>>61200975
why'd you copy this? >>61202295
>>61202204
So what if two people under the age of consent had sex with each other? Would they both suffer anything from phobias to severe mental illness?
>>61202322
No, you dingdong, because one of them isn't taking advantage of the other as they're both on equal ground psychologically. Is this really so hard for you to understand?
why does mr pierro hate homosexuals so much? http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/usa08.html#usa1108c
>>61202255
Willingly partaking in sex (whether underage or not) and being physically forced into it have different consequences.
>>61202351
>last but not least, singles
ahaha taking those no gf feels political
>>61201806
Ok, I guess I'll just take this win and be off. It's been fun, kid.
>>61202336
So you're saying all damage comes from the knowledge that you were taken advantage of by an older person. So boys and girls suffer the exact same psychological damage (when dealing with members of the opposite sex) in these situations, correct?
>>61202351
WEW LAD
E
W
L
A
D
new pasta?
>>61202351
>Second, if we have to expand the definition of marriage, why only expand it to homosexuals? Why is marriage limited to two people? why can't i marry six women at the same time? why can't you have marriage between two men and three women? Polygamy has been pervasive in ancient times, and it is among most mammal species. It is perfectly legal to be a single mother or single father, but it is not legal to have a marriage among three people. Abraham, considered a prophet by Jews, Christians and Muslims alike, had three wives (Sarah, Hagar and Keturah): was he a criminal? The Bible is full of cases of polygamy and never refers to them as amoral. Mohammed, the founder of Islam, had five wives.
so does he want to marry a 12 year old or five 12 year olds?
consent is impossible because you won't know if you got what you wanted until after
all sex is rape
>>61202423
Obviously not, because personal psychological experiences differ. So yes, someone's experience could have been overall positive. That doesn't make it any less wrong.
>>61201032
Well, you're just wrong on that point, bud. It may not be your cup of tea, but it's a goddamn masterpiece in it's genre.
>>61202351
is the site not working for anyone else here? his site just doesn't load for me here
>>61202503
i can screenshot the whole thing if you want
>>61202204
There are a million things that do psychological damage to people under the age of 18, that aren't illegal.
>>61200809
he's /mu/ incarnate
>>61202524
Such as? What does that matter?
>>61202351
he is mad homosexuals are ok now but people still frown upon paedofiles
>>61202492
>That doesn't make it any less wrong.
Why doesn't it? What if you were over the age of 18 and were involved with a genuine non-manipulative relatioship with an underage girl (in which you had sex) that ended on good terms? Would that do psychological damage?
>>61202351
i thought it was pretty common knowledge that his views on societal issues and philosophy are questionable
>>61202568
Death Grips
>>61202568
playing video games
>>61202618
Anyone who spend 10 minutes reading something on his website would realize that but because he seems to listen to a lot of music, read a lot of books, watch a lot of movies, people just automatically assume he's right about most things because he appears to be more knowledgeable about the world.
>>61202617
I just explained why it's manipulative by nature because teenagers are literally, LITERALLY incapable of making capable decisions. The rest of your example doesn't matter because of that. I'm done here, because you're clearly not understanding a word I'm saying.
>>61202437
this has been around for ages you faggot
>>61202657
>literally, LITERALLY incapable of making capable decisions
What the fuck are you talking about?
>>61202657
>teenagers are literally, LITERALLY incapable of making capable decisions
give me a fucking break
>>61202657
But you just said that someone's experience may have been overall positive.
>>61200795
What a pleb old man lol
Beyond Alive is objectively the worst track on JD
>>61202713
I'm >>61202713
The post you linked isn't relevent to my post.
>>61202720
Yeah but >>61201905 is talking about science, we are talking about marriage
I don't see the point in saying that the brain is not present until 18, it doesn't make a difference in marriage
>>61202749
Fucked that up. THIS post was directed at>>61202720
>>61202720
Hey man, I said...
>But you just said that someone's experience may have been overall positive.
Honestly, I'm not trying to win this "argument" I'm more interested in educating myself on this subject, so your response would be appreciated.
>>61200795
thats awesome, but our new music video is even better! plz like and subscribe!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pDqf0WtCP8
xxx GvM
>>61202720
Ok, well I guess I actually did end up "winning" this argument considering you're not able to respond. So in conclusion, there is a chance of doing psychological damage to the underage person, but it's not always the case. Noted.
>>61200975
>endtroducing
>7.5
>>61200975
Olivia Tremor Control is not on the list. laughable
>>61201806
>>61200795
I bet he will love the new Foo Fighters when he reviews them
>>61201374
>Helen of Troy
>Juliet
>Cleopatra
[spoiler]two of those people never existed[/spoiler]
>>61201623
>Stop wasting my time
you are literally on 4chan wasting your life faggot
>>61202065
>haha kiddo i won the internet fight junior it's been fun little guy
>yeah ok whatever
>/MU/ IS FILLED WITH CHILDREN
is this real life
>>61203399
I think the point was that the first dude was trying to have an actual discussion; but all you could do was meme.jpg
>>61203441
>the first dude
who do you think you are fooling, nerd?
>>61203567
You got me, senpai.
>>61203272
because it's not that good... live with it
>>61203182
you want it up or down?
OMFG, what is WITH this triggering content??
>>61201120
is it mulholland dr. by chance?
i can only give you eraserhead or inland empire.
>>61204033
>not that good
stick to tame impala redditor
>>61203333
quads can't give you reading comprehension
>>61200809
/mu/ Master Chef
>>61200833
>he wishes he could marry a 12 year old.
Source
>>61200833
> with a gigantic ego and weird social views
We all got an gigantic ego
>>61204606
stick to the beach boys lol
Scruffy, fix your shit, that IAALOBO album was released on 2012.
>>61201506
WAAAPE
WAAAAAAAAPE
The 21st century has truly produced some of the most unhealthy human ideas
>>61201374
>Pedophilia is a Christian morality play
>Marriage
>>61202351
"I personally feel oppressed by homosexuals:"
this is gold.
>>61200975
Where the fuck is post or homogenic?
>>61205203
ebin b8 mememes xDD
>>61203182
that was one of the only things in here I thought was perfect
>>61205712
they don't deserve to be on there, they're nothing but a 7/10, you inflated, p4k-reading cunt
>>61205798
>Post
>more than a 5
inflated cunt
>>61202947
> "Educating myself"
>4chan
wut.
>>61205899
I'm not here to educate myself. But if someone comes along who is seemingly knowledgeable on a subject that interests me, I'm going to take that opportunity to try and expand my knowledge. On this particular occasion however, I misjudged just how knowledgeable that person was.
>>61206027
That's like me going to a Skid row in search for enlightenment and being surprised when I come back empty handed.
Well Figuratively ofc, Literally, Literally i'd probably come back with hepatitis c.
>>61206228
Very funny joke, anon. But like I said, I didn't come here in search for anything.
scaruffi is the last based music critic, not letting emotions cloud his judgment like all the kuks at p4k
join me in thanking the scruffster for still keeping it real after all these years
THANK YOU SCRUFFY
>>61204992
>beach boys
literally no connection. at least say the beatles if you're trying to meme
wow, he actually changed the infamous line to "why is it illegal to marry a 12-year old" lmao
>>61206475
THANK YOU SCRUFFY
>>61200975
the only problem here is that endtroducing should be higher than a 7.5
>>61200809
the most patrish entity on the planet
his opinion is the only one which can be considered an objective fact
>>61200975
only problem is itaots isnt an 11
>>61203272
said the fag who probably hasnt even heard 1/4 of that list
