>>61198934
because no good music review site could possibly succeed

>>61198934
As opposed to a letter system?

>>61199002
A simple yes/no system would make way more sense

Because pitchfork doesn't understand what art is and instead thinks there's some definitive science behind scoring music. Like the pseudo intellects they are, Pitchfork believes they can ascertain the value of a peice of music down to the tenth of a point, as if it even makes sense to score a song an 8.3 rather than an 8.2, it doesn't make sense.

>>61199229
or worse, they know it's meaningless but do it anyway because it gets clicks

>>61199267
But that would just lead back to Op's question

>>61199307
i see, yeah it does
it proves that retards exist and that p4k relies on their stupidity for income

>>61198950
>good
kek

That's every rating system.

>having a 100 point score system
shig

How does pitchfork make money? They are universally hated, are there really that many page views from trolling through snobby/douchebag reviews?

>>61200256
>They are universally hated

you should leave your basement sometimes