>Autechre is better than Boards of Canada
>>61177664
They are though, also very different musically
>>61177664
I agree with this statement.
>>61177664
Aphex Twin is still better than both
Best of Autechre is better than Best of BOC but their worst is also far worse than BOC
>muh electronic albums
Rockist scum
>>61178116
>>>/bleep/
Stay in your containment general faggot
>>61177830
>>61177885
>>61178096
tips fedora
>>61178107
at what?
>>61177664
Yea
>>61178665
at sucking
>>61178624
Since when is autechre more fedora than BoC? Why would you even say such a stupid thing?
Not a profound statement, op. Everyone knows that
>>61178116
nobody mentioned electronic albums. you just came into the thread and got mad over a rockist bogeyman. do you have any idea how stupid you sound?
>>61178116
literally no one even mentioned albums
back to >>>/b/leep you moronic faggot
Autechre are pretty catchy, but the fact that a lot of their albums are just random parameters is sad.
I prefer BoC, at least they put more effort on the music.
ae is better than boc on overall quality (TH is mediocre and Campfire Headphase is awful), but the best of boc is better than the best of ae
>>61180145
only rockists listen to idm
>>61180272
>random
>frustratedseanboothface.jpg
It's not really all that random though, I mean they painstakingly narrow the parameters in their patches so they have a pretty good feel for what it will sound like. They're meticulously constructed, with Confield being the one that's the least so (that ones prob the most generative), but even then only a small percentage is left to chance. Also people don't seem to realize that only 4 of their 11 albums (+ EP7) were made using this method, yet it still seems defines their music process.
Anyway I don't even know why the two get compared so much - both very different.
>>61177664
>>61180806
>frustratedseanboothface.jpg
lel i remember that one interview where he went on a giant rant about term 'random' or 'generative programming' or smth after the interviewer used it
