>>61117211
The one in the middle

>>61117211
Da Capo

>>61117230
No one thinks this.

I honestly can't choose one over the other

>>61117243
I do

>>61117211
Pet Sounds > Forever Changes > Sgt. Pepper > Odyssey & Oracle
all at least an 8/10, though

Pet Sounds >>>> Sgt. Pepper > O&O > Love

I like them all

>>61117243
I do too

Beach Boys > Love > Zombies > Beatles

>>61117275
Dis

Sgt Pepper > Odessey & Oracle > Pet Sounds > Forever Changes

my personal ranking, don't bully pls

Forever Changes (6/10) > Pet Sounds (3/10) > Sgt. Pepper (3/10) > Odyssey & Oracle (2/10)

Pet Sounds > Forever Changes > Sgt Pepper > Odyssey and Oracle

Sgt Peppers only has a few great songs. Getting Better to Good Morning is pretty filler. Shame Strawberry Fields Forever and Penny Lane were left out.

>>61117654
"lol"

>>61117211
Love>Beach Boys>The Zombies>>>the beatles

never got what was important about them.

>>61117808
seriously bad fucking taste

>>61117628
awful taste faggot

>>61118744
its true

>>61117211
Beatles >Beach Boys > Love > Zombies

Sgt Peppers > Pet Sounds >>> Oddesey Oracle > Forever Changes

Sgt. Peppers > Pet Sounds > Forever Changes > O&O

>>61117275
You've got the order right but the power gap is really unesesary. They're all fantastic albums.

>>61117689
Filler and "songs I don't like" aren't synonyms. You don't makes songs as elaborate as She's Leaving Home and Mr. Kite to pad out an album.

Also: your opinions are shit and and you're probably either an uncultured pleb or a dick waving hipster who knows very little about music.

Boys>Zombs>Beats>Love

all good albums (except i didnt like forever changes very much)

>>61117211
Sgt. Pepper.

Also, why is Forever Changes there? Doesn't really have anything to do with the other three, other than being partially psychedelic pop. I would have chosen something like Preservation Society or maybe Would You Believe, any other Pet Sounds/Sgt. Pepper rip off