itt: things in music that annoy you
>a band doesn't release material until 10+ years after it's formed
>>60895150
what do you mean by this? how would this annoy you unless it was a supergroup or something? if its a new band and they havent released material how do they even have a following?
>>60895180
but they could make up anything, they could claim to be a "90s band" but didn't start recording anything until the 2000s
when im sitting at home enjoying silence and then music starts playing
>>60895202
do you have an example of this?
whats more annoying to me is when a band you love is tied up in a near decade long lawsuit and missed their prime recording age. now the lead singers 50 and losing his voice. im talking about tool by the way.
>>60895238
tenacious d is probably the closest, i might have been exaggerating a bit when i said 10+ years
>come on /mu/
>someone says album good
>album actually bad
>>60895150
I love music . But paul mccartney is a massive cancerous scumbag ..why couldnt mark have done both of them ...almost like a buy one get one free!!
>>60895238
Add to this releasing by Maynard a fuckton of shit by his shitty side projects nobody cares about in the meantime.
>>60895308
Yeah. i cant listen to Puscifer. Its so bad. They have like 1 good song in the humbling river but thats it. A perfect circle also has one good song in weak and powerless but THATS IT. Fuck. I mean imagine a world where tool has made like 3 albums between 2006 and now?
BeeGees
>formed in 1958
>first release in 1965, first international release 1967
>>60895358
Lol
>>60895358
>not popular until 1978
