Does /mu/ like progressive rock?
>>60828937
God, that album is fucking awesome...
Yes, but not random spork shit
Now Playing:
ıllıllı [Nektar - A Tab In The Ocean (1972)] ıllıllı
Yes, I do!
>>60829018
Right Side > Left Side
>>60828937
yea i listen to kid cudi
>>60829018
It's weird to consider something like England a classic when it's pretty obscure. Very nice album though.
I think kansas gets a bad rap for some of their buttrock/AOR shit, but their earlier album had great exciting 10 minute prog songs here and there.
>>60829018
>"pastoral"
>Kansas
>not Harmonium
That's my only issue with the chart.
>>60829383
I just stuck Kansas on the chart because I was listening to it a the time
It has nothing to do with the chart [desu]
>>60828937
>Does /mu/ like progressive rock?
Only stuff made after the 1990
>>60829403
Listen to Harmonium. They're really good.
Now Playing:
ıllıllı [SOPHIE - Product (2015)] ıllıllı
>>60829438
First two tracks are really great, but the others do nothing to me.
I can't believe I've never heard of this band before. Have I been living under a rock?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HbJBQ91ZZs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9URM_5R-vWk
I'm addicted to prog
I've restricted to just buying random shit off bandcamp because I'm desperate for more
Too bad most of it in the tag for it are all post rock instead
>>60829438
I think their following album is better IMO
>>60829522
Great album i think it sounds like elo with queen which is great
>>60829474
En Pleine Face is so beautiful though.
>>60828977
Indeed.
>ARE YOU WITH MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>60829617
Me too actually. The Five Seasons is more recognizable though.
>>60829438
If you understand French it's so much better
>>60829701
the fact that it's shorter makes it inherently more digestable and easy to get into yeah
>>60829662
Definitely strongly ELO, also Queen's early prog stuff if a big favourite of mine.
Apparently they were called Beatles in disguise but outside of the voice accents it doesn't really fit them.
It's just nice when I find some cool music that I can be excited listening to, as in, I haven't memorized the song note for note and section by section yet.
After many months of ignoring it after being totally bored by it, I relistened to Raven and found I actually really liked it. The melodies are very strong and pretty simple, but interesting too. Nice solos at times too. Could use a bit more energy though. Would his other stuff be in the same vein? I tried some Porcupine Tree a while ago but was turned off by it.
Anyways, I figured hey, if it worked for that it might work for that other big release English Electric from a while back, but it still bored me to tears still. Every song starts out super quiet and slow and is at the same mid-range tempo. Also doesn't really feel like Genesis to me.
Reminder that if you consider Tool and DT 'faux-prog' you are a moron
>>60829018
Friend: U coming to work today?
Me: No
Friend: Why?
ME: LE ASS IS ON FIRE!!!! O_O
Why progressive rock is chessy most of the time?
>>60829948
Prog usually relies in being dramatic in scope and delivery, and also being fun for the musician, which usually doesn't translate to being very "cool".
>>60829018
I'm not usually one for "wacky" but I love some.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKK8kdDVMag
>>60829018
what is the fox album?
>>60830361
What fox?
>>60830361
Doomsday Afternoon by Phideaux? Was actually pretty big on /mu/ back in the day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czY2-526Ous
Great band, pick up Number Seven, Doomsday, and Snowtorch. their Chupacabras song is great too.
New album releasing soon :^)
>>60830454
>New album releasing soon
We can only hope
>>60830476
It'll happen guys!
