So with the new AnCo songle releasing today, let's play a game, /mu/. We predict what the songle will sound like, what sounds it will have, and if we get it right we won or whatever.
If you agree with someone just quote him
>song will have Purple Bottle/Turn Into Something type drums
>>60707366
Avey shrieking at least once, hopefully.
it will sound like art angels
Will sound like CHz only more shit (if possible)
AnCo :vom:
Probably something energic like strawberry jam but with feelings like sung tongs. A mixture of acoustic guitars and experimental electronica
holy fuck deakin is ugly
>>60707490
#noMakeup
>>60707366
What is this "songle" foolery?
>>60707470
back to your grimes thread faggot
Okay
I believe the song will be shit like every other thing Animal Shitlective has ever made. It will be tryhard pretentious indie crap that is labelled as experimental because it's slightly unconventional. Despite it's terribleness, I'm sure you idiots will eat it up like fries at McDonalds. You're all probably gonna think "Wow so experimental like my favorite Radiohed album Kid A!!!1" because you know nothing of actual experimental music like Penderecki and Boulez. I pity you idiots but I can't really do anything about it unless you listen to me.
To those smart enough to understand what I'm saying:
Congratulations.
To those too stupid to comprehend the meaning of my message:
Enjoy your happy meals you fucking retards.
>>60707975
I'M NOT SICK BUT I'M NOT WELL
>>60707988
What is the point of this post?
Hmm, well based on their recent output, well fuck their entire discography, i guess it will sound;
>shit
>>60708009
AND I'M SO HOOOOTTT
>>60708016
Agreed
>>60708018
Can you please stop shitposting? Thanks.
>>60708025
CAUSE I'M IN HEEELLLLLLL
>>60708028
>>60707975
I lost a substantial amount of respect for you after you called them pretentious, then name dropped some composers to convey the message "I listen to real music". Thus, looking pretentious yourself, still, i agree with you on every point, your quite the polarising figure famu.
>>60708054
I'm glad you agree. I don't quite understand how I'm pretentious for naming actual experimental music though.
da songle when
>>60707420
hopefully
