ITT: artists /mu/ ignores the express wishes of
not an issue for me. i prefer men with firm, muscles bums and not womemes with puffy, undefined bottoms. also her music's too boring for my tastes.
>>60526646
why not both senpai
>>60526598
Then why display your bum instead of focusing on the music.
>>60526598
She's an attention whore anyway. If she was a mature adult she'd just ignore it.
>>60526690
you're fucking stupid. She doesn't focus on her bum, she focuses on her music, which you would know if you actually listened to it. Just because she has a bum doesn't mean she's flaunting it.
seriously though, whos staring at her bum when shes got chest puppies the size of fucking zeppelins
>>60526766
>female artists
>has a billion photos taken of her some of which are sexual
Stop objectifying me!!!
>>60526921
Sounds familiar...
>>60526921
>sexual pictures
besides her wearing some slightly provocative clothing (which isn't really, unless you're mormon or something), there are not pictures that are "sexual". Also, are you saying that a artist having pictures taken of them is anything besides fucking expected?
>>60526964
ayy lmao
>>60526964
For what purpose do you think all those photos exist of her are for if not to sexualize her? Just because isn't in any explicit photographs doesn't mean that isn't the intent.
>>60527024
so if a male artist takes a picture shirtless then he's focusing more on his sexuality than his music? Get off your fucking high horse ffs.
Plus, she was playing a character.
>>60527052
are you saying that every time a picture is taken of an artist, it is meant to sexualize him or her?
>>60527058
If he does it in bed sure, its one thing to be shirtless on stage as a male for means of "rocking out" or going wild, but yes there's a reason there's almost literally 0 male bed shots with implied no clothing on. Stop being sucha fucking tumblrite sperg
>>60526888
not the way id say it but that doesnt make it wrong
>>60527103
There are plenty of male artists who take pictures where the desired effect is to make people think about sex. If a song or album is about sex, it fits, and it also doesn't make it "degenerate" or "titcore" just because they're talking about sex and they're attractive. If she was ugly, but still taking these "provocative" pictures you wouldn't say shit. Bjork does it and it's considered art in the highest form
>>60526766
>>60527286
Is this supposed to prove that point? Really?
>>60527286
we're gonna need some marina cleavage as well
>>60527549
>>60526598
>wears extremely sexual outfits that show off her beautiful curves
>"s-stop looking at my body! Listen to my horrible music!"
Top kek
>>60527208
>If she was ugly, but still taking these "provocative" pictures you wouldn't say shit. Bjork does it and it's considered art in the highest form
because she makes better music than marina, simple as that. i personally don't care when someone does sexually provocative things but let's not forget to acknowledge that it's often used to take the focus off of the music itself - either because it's uninteresting or just plain bad. also
>implying bork is ugly
What's with girls complaining about guys looking at them sexually when that's exactly what they want? And why do white knights always defend this attention whoring?
>>60527625
they look heavy
i would hold them for her tbqh
>>60526646
>2015
> Being gay
>>60527954
>2015
>not being at least a little gay
>>60527954
>2015
>not being bisexual
Alice Cooper lied
>>60526598
don't make shit music then, laddy
>has a hypersexualized public image
>"But take me seriously as an artist though lmao"
>>60528065
>hypersexual
I don't think that word means what you think it means.
>>60528107
You think wrongly.
>>60527286
oh fuck that's a nice bum
her music's shit that's why
>>60527286
can u imagine the sex with that nice bum
