i think thom yorke is a bad singer
you may not like his voice, but calling him a bad singer is moronic
>>60347482
But you're wrong faggot
http://youtu.be/BbWBRnDK_AE
>>60347508
Ok, so explain.
>>60347482
Like >>60347508 said, he may have not have the most beautiful voice, but you wont find the same range of emotion in the singing of many other rock singers.
>>60347524
Well its pretty obvious he's extremely skilled technically. A bad singer couldn't pull off songs like Fake Plastic Trees and Reckoner. Those are just a couple of examples.
>>60347533
what about bono? and even i think he's ugh
>>60347562
I honestly haven't listened to enough U2 to make an informed comment
>>60347482
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQZ1DDs_cMM
He has a pretty good range of things he can do. I'd call it being a good singer.
I suppose that you could argue that he's a jack of all trades, master of none.
>>60347559
skilled technically, i guess, but i feel he's kind of generic
>>60347623
how so? I think he's quite unique
He definitely has an unconventional voice but he's not a bad singer
>>60347623
everyone in alt and indie has ripped of Yorke's vocal falsetto style of fucking course he seems generic now
>>60347648
same with bono, i feel he has this whiny voice, sure, not all radiohead songs are like this, one i can name, if i'm right, is wolf at the door. but i don't enjoy this whiny gentle voice you hear from u2, coldplay, ect
>>60347656
actually, they all ripped Jeff Buckley. Even Thom admits to this.
>>60347696
Thom ripped off Microsoft Sam though
>>60347696
Jeff FUCKley
>>60347762
>implying he fucks
>>60347623
>i feel he's kind of generic
>he's kind of generic
>kind of generic
>generic
holy my sides
>>60347522
hey native
>>60347482
I don't like Radiohead in general. I could never get into them.
