I'm rather new to /mu/ and the music community in general. I'm kind of struggling to quantify what makes a song album filler, so I would like some examples. The rules are simple:
1. Post an album
2. Post every song on that album you consider filler.
Starting with an easy album.
"filler" is just a pseudo-intellectual's way of saying "song on the album that I find boring and/or unremarkable"
Filler doesn't actually exist
Hope I've helped
>>60289300
I don't think that's strictly true. If you only have 30 minutes of music worth showing but your label demands 40 minutes then you could bang out a simple song.
My question is how people confidently call something album filler.
THEY only a filler if you aint a real niqqa
>>60289300
This is generally true with good albums. Top 40 albums are generally pure filler.
>Become Death
>Hit Factory of Sadness
>Tathagatagarbha
>One Hand Washed the Other
>The Cute
>No Now
>Now I Am
album would be an 8 or 9 if these tracks fucked off
>>60289341
Do labels actually demand certain lengths on albums?
>>60290756
yes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tzn3_NEek4M
>Track 4. "Pistol (A. Cunanan, Miami, FL. 1996)"
This fucking song almost ruined the entire album for me.
>>60289231
Horrible choice of album for this topic. I'll bet you consider the instrumental tracks 'filler'
mixtapes have a lot of filler
take this one for example
pretty much most songs on this one, along with some really high points tho
>>60290756
Back in the day, you had to cram as much crap onto the LP to justify pressing them
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdEiH6BbiDQ
so you'd get shit like that.
