Do you willingly associate with Type Zeros?
those are music types not people types
>>60278138
Yes, because it's a meme chart.
If your bedroom is the only environment in which you experience music then your taste is utterly irrelevant
i miss the Hampus' era
it's all about Aaron and le absolute madman now
>math rock in Type 0
>>60278138
avant-teen.jpg
>>60278357
>if you don't like basic bitch pop/rock you're an avant-teen
All fags in this thread thinking you're cool for liking shit that literally isn't music.
>>60278381
post your curve
everyone is a type zero / listens to it
I try not to associate with people under iv
>>60278413
inorie, if its not got a 4/4 beat to dance to and lyrics you can sing along too its just noise xD
>>60278459
Ya but I guess I'm part type 3. Dont know why traditional folk is so high.
>>60278413
Here's your reply
>>60278282
>>60278357
>>60278413
>>60278459
>not listen exclusively to true patrician music
https://youtube.com/watch?v=myIJWxrZx1E
smgh
>>60278316
>does not like pointy elbows
>considers himself a patrician
>>60278138
Your image took me to Tadeusz Baird
We are blessed, we are cursed.
Thank you, now I can be a metaphysical patrician.
Honestly if I heard someone talk seriously about any genre in a class above type 2 I would not want to associate with then
>>60278843
pleb
>>60278515
Pretty interesting but I gotta say there's more pleasant avant-garde music.
>>60278138
can someone post something from class-
>>60278843
>EAI/onkyo
>free improv
>free/avant-garde jazz
>musique concrete/tape music
>zeuhl
>american primitivism
>not good
topleb
Also why did Hampus list so many (almost) synonymous terms. Must be to create an illusion of variety. Pretty clever.
>>60278924
Okay, the part from eight minutes onward was actually pretty enjoyable.
The patrician meme has gone too far
>limiting yourself to specific sections of the pyramid
I don't like the patrician meme, but a true patrician is someone who appreciates all music. Plebs are narrow-minded. Patricians aren't. Or maybe they are?
>>60278138
type 3 here. im fine where im at i dont feel the need to be such a hipster retard that i listen to xenoacoustiwhateverthefuckitis
>>60278413
if it has rhythm it's music. speaking in terms of composition, rhythm is literally the only thing a sound needs to be music so that means everything is music because everything has some kind of a rhythm. melody and harmony come next as important aspects of music being music but arent even essential.
>>60278138
I bet you're the type of guy who thinks that people who enjoy music on an emotional level are inferior.
>>60278495
>>60278502
>>60278515
>>60280124
>ur le trollimggg xDDDD
kill yourselves. Staticcore or noisecore or whatever the fuck you "patricians" listen to is not music. You're not cool for liking it. Everyone thinks you're a fucking freak and that's why you have no friends or gf. Your own family is probably ashamed they have a neet autist like you in their house listening to static or screeching all day.
>>60281191
Type 0 detected
I fit into all 6 of these so I feel good about myself. I'm the music God. Prove me wrong.
>>60281191
fuck off back to reddit pleb
>mfw sonorism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uaOa28SoBJE
This is pretty nuts
>>60281424
Ahura Mazda - Immensity EP
>sonorism
Sample: >>60281424
Link: https://mega.nz/#!XhMkFD7R!wOVj7lBGXVNVL9OzlxjaWUjscw-yfnFee1AyHQ5NxDM
I couldn't figure out if the correct track listing was the one on the Music Glue page or if the correct one was the number prefixes on each of the filenames. I sided with the filenames. Let me know if you think otherwise. I'm guessing the Music Glue track listing was something that Mazda had no control over.
https://www.musicglue.com/ahura-mazda/products/ahura-mazda---immensity-ep-2015/
>>60281191
>getting this absolutely anal prolapsed over the taste of others
I can't even call you triggered. Whatever you are right now it's well past triggered.
Try to calm yourself. It's only 4chan you sperg.
>>60278138
Yes. The distinctions between Type 0 through to Type 3 don't make much sense.
>>60282382
through to Type 2, I should say.
>>60278413
This is what happens when /mu/ pretends to stop being elitist, plebs begin to think they're in good company
>>60281191
>stop liking what I don't like
>everyone different than me is a loser and failure at life
if this is unironic, please die
>>60281191
Post like these are why /mu/ will never be close to a board like /lit/. You have idiots defending their idiocy too violently instead of actually maturing and growing.
>>60282517
He's definitely baiting if it's any consolation.
>>60282517
Anti Intellectualism is the big meme right now
>>60278138
This is a troll chart. Most of the Type 0s aren't even genres but rather ways of composing (some of which encompass quite accessible music too).
>>60281424
This is actually very interesting to listen to. Thanks anon.
>>60282627
Name one xenharmonic song that made the Top 40
>>60278515
This is really not nice and I don't understand why someone would want to listen to this desu.
>>60282683
I said some of them, by which I was referring to generative electronics and arguably aletoricism. Generative covers fairly mainstream stuff like Eno and Autechre.
>>60278138
What's the source for the background image?
>>60278336
math rock is the most pleb genre of all time you turbopleb
>>60278138
If you don't associate with all of them, you're a fucking pleb and should kill yourself. Not trying out everything is fucking disgusting.
>>60285038
this
>>60282704
>I don't understand why someone would want to listen to this
Of course you don't, pleb.
>Still not getting that it's a subjective interest
>>60282517
Once you "mature" you realize that 99 percent of avant-garde and "academic" is total hackery, made by people more phony than your average top 40 pop star.
It is cute to see music theory 101 students attempt try hard navel gazing at the latest "innovative" compositional technique, though.
>>60286284
sounds like you never got past music theory 101
Are you saying Brian Ferneyhough is a hack?
>>60286387
Any composer who becomes more infatuated with his structure than his aesthetic is a hack. Structure is simply a means to an end. But too many composers in academia are more concerned with inventing movements and "innovating" than with making music. Schoenberg is the poster boy for that egotistical mentality.
Does this describe BF, I don't know.
>>60286595
you dont find Schoenberg aesthetically pleasing?
He has all those late romantic sensibilities though, and wanted to continue writing in that style. Look at verklarte nacht or the 5 pieces for orchestra.
Schoenberg was a reluctant revolutionary. The poster boy for academia with no thought for aesthetics should be elliott carter (even though his works are fascinating)
Sounds like you just cant comprehend 20th century art music, or dont know enough about it to make a coherent opinion.
Try this documentary:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSkidzg6TUQ
>>60286718
>you dont find Schoenberg aesthetically pleasing?
Whether I find him aesthetically pleasing or not is irrelevant. I'm taking to task this silly academic mentality that puts structure before aesthetic.
Now maybe for some the structure IS the aesthetic, but art typically doesn't work that way. I don't care how many semi-tones, polyrhythms, counterpoints, and other such compositional conceits you shove into your "40 Men Farting" piece. End of the day, it's still 40 men farting. Maybe that aesthetic appeals to some, and fair enough, but my point is that structural innovation doesn't automatically lead to a compelling work. And too many "music fans" take the bait in this instance and praise something on the basis of its structural novelty (or concept, in the case of awful shit like Good Morning, Good Night) and not anything else. A work also gets bonus points from these same types for having a cute academic name and being "inaccessible" to the masses. I find the whole exercise diminishing.
And music theory is descriptive. Another mistake people make concerning that is they think it's prescriptive, that a piece needs to adhere to a certain theoretical framework (often lauded by the professor or institution in question) to be worthwhile. There's countless examples of this kind of dogmatic, agenda driven mentality throughout 20th century academia.
>“While the tonal system, in an atrophied or vestigial form, is still used today in popular and commercial music, and even occasionally in the works of backwards-looking serious composers, it is no longer employed by serious composers of the mainstream,” he wrote. “It has been replaced or succeeded by the 12-tone system.”
>>60278413
eyl
>>60286718
Is this just orchestral cause the description on amazon says it covers 20th century music in general?
