ITT: albums that you just cannot decide for the life of you if they are okay or great
pic very related
>>55455081
The problem with this is that I think I've decided it's good, I just have no desire to listen to it more which is really infuriating to me as a Godspeed fan.
>>55455081
Why can't you decide anon? just be honest with yourself and ask yourself how much you enjoyed from the album, and there you go.
Personally i thought it was a fantastic album, i love it, espicially the drone in the middle of it
>>55455119
i think the second half is amazing, but the first half...less so
>tfw saw this album played live
>>55455145
The opener is really good in my opinion
>>55455081
I think that it's better than we give it credit for, but not better than some other Godspeed works- 8/10.
>>55455203
i think i can agree with this
>>55455081
Not really given it a full listen yet. Although it does sound like this though from what I've heard already, which isn't a bad thing. Just doesn't feel as original as albums like Skinny Fists.
There's nothing that special about Mac but I've listened to this album a lot.
>>55455081
Asunder light 7
Not as good as ADBA strong 7.
>>55455536
Sit back, relax, and fully appreciate link related.
if it doesn't do it for you, you'll have your answer on the album.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azTCWP8nZNg
>>55455536
I definitely love this album. Not sure why it's so underrated.
![liturgy_arklp[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/G7OOtNa.jpg "liturgy_arklp[1].jpg")
>>55455640
>>55455649
>reading comprehension
This was pretty crappy bit I liked it.
To rate it honestly, I'd give it a 4/10, but in terms of enjoyment it's a 7/10.
>>55455679
Are you sure it's not you?
The anon poster don't know if the Earth album is ok or great
The two posts are relevant.
>>55455081
I think the problem with it is it sounds like a total formulaic godspeed album.
>EPIC
>drone
>drone
>EPIC
The production seems really tight and some songs manage to be catchy without feeling excessive or forced, but the writing is fairly lacking. Wish that I got to see more from this record when I went to go see them, but they played a greatest-hits set because I went to a larger venue.
>>55455655
This, every time I listen it's like something amazing is on the verge of clicking, but it never does and it feels like irritating noise.
Can't tell if it's the artistic statement of the year or a 4/10.
>>55455737
So it's a 7/10 then.
>>55455655
Yeah, I've listened to it about ten times and I think the sheer ambition of it is amazing but it is awful in some places. Especially after the 8th track.
>>55455640
Just listened to it, and it's quite relaxing. I'd imagine getting high to this would be fun. Quite like it, but I'm more of a fan of Earth 2 myself.
>>55455858
>earth 2
mee too :^)
It has some good tracks, but I'm not sure how I feel about it overall. Pistol and Wicked Campaign, for example, are shit.
>>55455852
Nice Fantano analysis of The Ark Work
Vitriol and Kel Valhaal are the best tracks.
>>55455081
How the hell do you not know if you like it or not?
Go read a review or something if you can't decided for your self
>b-b-but I only like the second half
then listen to that part only
>b-b-but I have to listen to an album all the way through
don't know what to tell you.
Don't be afraid to form your own opinions.
>>55455737
>To rate it honestly, I'd give it a 4/10, but in terms of enjoyment it's a 7/10
what does that even mean?
>>55456077
In terms of quality, it's a 4/10. But Anon kind of enjoyed it a bit, so based on the enjoyment he got from the album, he'd rate it a 7/10.
I think anyway. I'm sleep deprived, so I could just be spewing bullshit.
