Who is the Quentin Tarantino of music?
Radiohead
Led Zeppelin
>>55220569
Nirvana
RZA
Mark Ronson
Michael Gira.
Makes great original and challenging stuffs, but not quite too challenging, hated by normies and losers.
Maynard James Keenan
>>55220612
>hated by normies
ha
hahaha
ha
Anyone who's "really into cinema" likes him
>>55220569
Morrissey... cuz they kinda look similar
>>55220585
this is the first thing that came to mind for me, too
>>55220644
OH MY GOD ME TOO WE SHOULD BE BEST FRIENDS
The Avalanches.
It's just mashup when you get right down to it, but he's good at it.
>>55220612
I like your reasoning, but I don't think Gira is quite as well known as Tarantino is
>>55220695
what's your favorite color
Anthony Fantano
>>55220830
thanks for the new wallpaper, friend
Kraftwerk, hands down. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0lIlROWro8
Jet
Josh Homme
Foot Patrol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAxQyAHtr8U
>>55220585
This is the correct answer. Known and popular in the mainstream with credibility amongst people who really like being known as being 'alternative'. Have good ideas and make entertaining art, but ultimately more accessible pastiches of their influences. Both are super into feet
>>55220635
A bunch of people I know who are plebs love Pulp Fiction, try harder anon.
>>55220591
him and GZA
KANYE WEST IS THE ONLY CORRECT ANSWER
![dbdd10020aa7d02338ae126865c1d0b6[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/SLEhBD8.jpg "dbdd10020aa7d02338ae126865c1d0b6[1].jpg")
oh it shows dave, it shows
>>55220585
I thought it was established that Radiohead is the Stanley Kubrick of music.
Correct answer is Jet
Steals retro shit to make hits
Used in car commercial tier artistic integrity
>>55221447
This makes more sense. I'd say that QT is more comparable to Tool.
>>55221367
Just because a movie is lacking in hard to decipher obscurity doesnt make it any less of a good film, it just means that its a great film in another way. That said, pulp fiction is just a great movie that can be appreciated by anyone.
>>55221499
Jet aren't consistently popular though, and they don't have as much of a legacy, they were a flash in the pan. Also there are countless bands that rip off retro shit, it's not enough of a parallel.
>>55221525
Nah scratch that. Tool is more comparable to David Lynch. Their both pretty good, but they attract turbo plebs.
>>55220585
not nearly edgy enough
The Strokes!
Is This It = Reservoir Dogs (Obviously their best)
Room On Fire = Pulp Fiction (Still good, not as good as their first but still just as/more loved then their first)
First Impressions of Earth = Jackie Brown (Different from their other stuff and therefore alienated by fans)
Angles = Kill Bill (Just plain silly)
Comedown Machine = Inglourious Bastards (Odd combination of humour and darkness)
Next Strokes album confirmed to be their worst.
>>55220569
>comically over the top
>doesn't take itself seriously
It can only be Cannibal Corpse
>>55221447
no thats definitely pink floyd
>>55220725
Oh my god bitch
Nick Cave
Link Wray you fuckers.
>>55220600
Actually maybe.
>>55220700
Also maybe, but not enough output.
There's gotta be someone who fits a little better. Someone who repackages and remixes semi obscure music into something new, and releases popular but critic-respected music across multiple genres.
>>55221384
Weirdly, you may be right.
literally Death Grips
>>55222501
only correct answer in the thread
I thought it would have been more like someone like Ariel Pink who worked in a record store and is able to regurgitate at a moment's notice every cliche and every famous riff known to man, yet do it in a way that is novel, acclaimed and artful.
>>55220612
>hated by normies
Everyone loves Tarantino
