>reverse lunga edition
Post the tracks you're working on, discuss general music composition. Learn how to collab for charity and why it's so great to be around seamen.
Remember to use:
>clyp.it for WiPs
>soundcloud for completed tracks and getting called a homo for not going to soundcloud threads
We're making an album! (or trying to).
Check the next post for info.
Stuff:
>Pastebin - Links, books, videos, articles, tutorials and stuff:
http://pastebin.com/pYGCLu6q
>/prod/ wiki - looking for contributors (wink, wink)
http://mu-sic-production.wikia.com/wiki//mu/sic_Production_Wiki
Previous thread: >>53363403
>>53384864
We're making an album! (or trying to).
How to join:
>Take a good look at this picture
>Be inspired by it
>that's it
Anything goes, feel free to find anons to collab and have fun with in any way you want. Or just work solo.
We're doing this for fun.
first for starting off a /prod/ thread the RIGHT way
First for Dave Smith fucking your mum
reposting because i'm insecure
https://clyp.it/kt5ggvmh
>>53384921
>didnt get first
not this time
>>53384940
10/10 would pay money for
>ambient techno?
https://clyp.it/abz2uu4x
WIP
Any of you guys use Bitwig Studio? I've been hearing good stuff from its users.
>>53385168
it's the exact same thing as ableton that's why
>>53385247
minus track grouping (lel) and it has loljava under the hood (LOL)
>>53385268
>minus track grouping
oh wow lol, no wonder nobody seems to really care about bitwig
I've recently discovered the wonders of rutracker, what software should I not buy?
https://clyp.it/3dgygrx1
I'm pretty confident in the chord progression and overall vibe, but I have no idea how to arrange electronic music like this. Any tips to stretch this out into a full song?
>>53385268
>loljava
Pls go with your /g/ memes
>>53385168
It'll be better than Ableton once they reach feature parity, in my opinion
>>53385877
This is pretty nice, maybe a little to mud range, just a very tiny bit. Might be just me. As far as stretching it out, just try to write another part. Or maybe take a single layer of that part and write something different over it in the same key.
>>53385877
>https://clyp.it/3dgygrx1
put some more high end freq in it. it'd make it sound more "there" ya know? i feel like its to distant.
>>53385679
All of it.
>>53385042
Is this the ultimate compliment?
>>53385963
>>53385965
Nah there's definitely mud, I haven't bothered with mixing it at all yet. Do you think adding high end would make it stand up stronger? because right now I feel like anything past a minute and a half is repetitive, but maybe more presence would make it more compelling.
>>53386097
your clyp > subtract layers (drop) > clyp+new track with high end making it sound like a dif part.
>>53384940
Give it a couple of quiet layers to fill it out, increase the lengths of the plucks a little, give the drums some meat, and you've got something good. This is the part where a field recorder and some ambient samples would be helpful.
>>53384916
music theory is for prissy know it all collegegirl FAGS
https://clyp.it/hozdkcwa
Bumo
>>53386244
hey do YOU know how to spell a G minor seventh chord?! HAH! checkmate!
>>53386546
yeah i might
lets see
here goes nothing
G M I N O R S E V E N T H C H O R D
M I N O R S E V E N T H C H O R D
I N O R S E V E N T H C H O R D
N O R S E V E N T H C H O R D
O R S E V E N T H C H O R D
R S E V E N T H C H O R D
S E V E N T H C H O R D
E V E N T H C H O R D
V E N T H C H O R D
E N T H C H O R D
N T H C H O R D
T H C H O R D
H C H O R D
C H O R D
H O R D
O R D
R D
D
how did i do
>>53386546
good post. music thoery is important
>>53386611
looks like this man is qualified to review music here
>>53386631
what's music theory got to do with reviewing music?
>>53386211
what should I do about quiet layers is there a popular thing to do? are these things that should be at all audible or just like pseudo filler? Or could I just add something like another tape hiss..
>>53386661
shut the fuck up
>>53386488
bump
>>53386822
whoa and now it looks as if it's really you who's the one who is qualified to review music
>>53386863
whats being an assertive, opinionated douchebag got to do with reviewing music?
Any tips for this mix?
https://clyp.it/kyl5u44a
>>53386855
>>53386488
>https://clyp.it/hozdkcwa
i listened to this the first time you posted it. not as distorted but could definitely lay off the distortion a little more. make it a tad more clear and really love that drop :37. keep it up dude
>>53386888
mostly everything nowadays
keking because why are you talking about reviewing music in a production thread. im sure there's the nightly p4k is still in session
>>53386888
>assertive, opinionated douchebag
that's the basic qualifications for being a critique
>>53386945
sasauge fatten or boost some of your weaker values. overall good song but the sound is a little flat
>>53387098
cool. thanks man. im just trying to get a few more people to hear it before i change it too much. i think maybe theres a market around this kind of sound? no idea but i love making it.
![25111be0ee[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/NbVtkIb.png "25111be0ee[1].png")
>>53387221
That's the scary part man, I already did this to the master.
>>53387337
k did u individually eq any of the sounds that should stand out?
>>53385950
do you honestly think that running on the jvm isn't going to introduce latency and other issues?
man..when i make a track 90% of the time i'm just listening to it on repeat while i cruise the internet. like i make one part and spend a day listening to it then next day add a little more and spend the rest of the day listening to it; rinse and repeat. i never finish a track cause i get tired of hearing it after a week. it's a bitch tryna work myself to actually work on a song all day rather then just making on synth and melody and calling it a day. anyone else have this problem?
>>53387419
every track has an eq thrown on either to eliminate lows, boost them, or raise the high end
>>53387476
incredible. maybe its your rendering?
