/bleep/
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
Okay, fuck everything I just said. The real inventor of electronic music was Grog, who in 65,000 BC started banging his stick against a rock in a rhythmic, synchronous repetetitetitetive motion, thereby producing the first tribal track. And what, pray tell, is so electronic about that? Well....he was struck by lighting at the time. It really gave an analogue warmth and fullness to his sound.
There. Have I done it? Is this the end? Are you satisfied now, you sophmoric, pedantic fucks?
Is your precious little electronic dork IDM history now complete for all to recognize the timelessness of your pompous, "forward-thinking" music? Are you pissed off that I left out the Ondes-Martenot or that I snubbed the mighty Ondioline or Heliophon, and you can't wait to send me a snobbish, pretentious email decrying "CONTINUITY ERROR! CONTINUITY ERROR!"?
You know, sooner or later you conceited tools are going to realize that it doesn't matter who made what or how it came out when.
The purpose of music is to have fun and enjoy it and identify with the culture that does, not to flaunt your oh-so-deep and sophisticated air of superiority like a snivelling, skinned-knee school kid who got picked last for kickball. And when that happens you're going to want to stop with the intellectual bedwetting, or else we should just keep on going and just admit that electronic music started with the motherfucking Big Bang so we can pride ourselves on how brilliant and genius we think we are (yes, that means you, Tobias).
We gotta draw the line. Where is that line? I don't know. I don't care. I think this is the first timeline I've ever seen that actually goes backwards, though. Hey, howabout that.
first
UK Garage is good
xth for Dark Souls and no new Burial ever
>>52176080
gg m8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHtNPzaHO7k
>>52176091
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6HeKc_ZC7k
post some techno that's not trendy dark ambient bullshit pls
>>52176091
epik meme :D
>>52176105
why would u want to listen to techno thats not trendy dark ambient bullshit
>>52176105
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBmL7iZpCb0
>>52176129
because it's fucking shitty
cant wait till christmas so i can cop all of these
Bump for no Burial.
>>52176120
>meme
No friend. In fact that post is to counter memespammers who like to post "UK Garage is shit" when they don't even know any proper garage tunes at all.
i've never listened to any four tet where do i start
dubstep IS grime...and its ALL HIPHOP...the BBC created the name Dubstep to SEGREGATE Caucasians from People of Color....If a Caucasian producer made this track...people would say DUBSTEP.....just like Timberland makes futuristic Tech Crunk..and the media says R&B.... smh
>>52176227
www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbrYJrDKLtc
>>52176194
post proper garage tunes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW_3GHHd0n0
>>52176050
>bleeps bloops
>music
>>52176227
'if left to my own devices i have no idea what music to listen to, due to the fact that i don't really like music, i just thought it'd be cool to be 'that music guy''
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57JmlhRXfG8
>>52176239
What youtube video did you get this off?
>>52176252
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vF8lblvVZ4
>>52176308
um I just want to know where to start without having to trawl through the entire discography, chill
what's wrong with that
>>52176349
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vgxfRMJt44
>>52176308
"no one else is allowed to listen to music i like except from me!!!!!! look how special i am!!!!! you're not a true music fan!!!!!!"
>>52176094
but he has to play that game a lot though
>>52176358
ayy pardner CHILL and post sum chilly ass beets!
>>52176403
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCTPwYM4fFk
>>52176440
great argument
>>52176432
It's the kinda game that once you get into it, you can play it for days and months. It took me 3-4 playthroughs to not miss anything in the world.
>>52176358
i apologise i'm quite bored
there is love in you is probs his best but his singles on text are the most /bleep/
>>52176415
lol weird
>>52176475
www.youtube.com/watch?v=GT6J33_-LNw
there you go fam
chillest beat ever
#JUSTCHILLOUTBRO!
is music for the quiet hour by shackleton any good?
>>52176494
did you not catch my sick reference m8?
>>52176444
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uKbuoSvj8M
>>52176510
Flume is overrated and the original is better. Not that it was that good in the first place. Decent throwback chart tune at best.
>>52176514
its really good if your baked and currently in the quiet hour.
>>52176514
yes. most shack is worth hearing.
>>52176510
you're trying way too hard
go to bed
>>52176516
I guess not lad :(
>>52176510
this is far from bad just a bit bait
>>52176510
gtfo
>>52176534
is it one of those records thats gonna take me 20 listens to be able to figure out though
i mean i like music like that but just a heads up would be appreciated
>>52176521
Not big on Disclosure, but El-B did this one pretty well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lUiHbl1y-A
>>52176580
music is either bangin or peak
>>52176528
>disclosure
>decent chart tune
>decent anything
smh just leave so we can post grime & jungle
>>52176540
see picture
>>52176580
its kinda ambient tbh. its not really complicated if i remember correctly
>>52176580
do you even like music? or do you just want to look cool?
>>52176634
i was thinking that
>>52176634
lol what are you talking about
>>52176598
fuck off dickhead
>>52176654
who the fuck listen to an album 20 times waiting for it to "click"?
>>52176613
fuck new tunes. what about the unreleased new tunes?
Feral Witchchild when
Stairwell when
True Love VIP when
Afterglow when
unreleased Rough Sleeper segment when
Lambeth feels like cheating because we've had it in full and in decent quality for ages now
>>52176694
its hyperbole, but are you saying you've never heard complex abstract music that took you many listens before it clicked for you?
>>52176698
*the unreleased old tunes
>>52176698
they are never getting released m8, just accept it
>>52176721
>shackleton
>complex abstract music
>>52176613
Aha. Dark Souls 2 wasn't nearly as good as 1 unfortunately.
>>52176698
>Lambeth feels like cheating because we've had it in full and in decent quality for ages now
Seriously though...
>2009: "Oi, mate. This is Benji B. Brand new and exclusive Burial tune for ya right here."
>plays Lambeth
>2014:"Oi mate, this is Benji B joined by Kode9. We got a brand new Burial tune for you. This one's called Lambeth."
>plays literally the exact same version of Lambeth as in 2009, except 20 seconds shorter
Did Benji B think we all forgot or something?
>>52176721
of course not
If I don't like I just delete it
>>52176698
>>52176725
#hope
>>52176698
>>52176748
it's even more funnier that the released one is mastered like absolute shite and i'd rather enjoy the rip in its' full 128kbps hissy glory
>>52176757
lmao ok so you judge all music on first listen? are you serious? what kind of music fan does that?
>>52176807
Yeah, the official version was brickwalled to hell. The disortion on it is pretty bad.
And yeah the R1 rip from 5 years ago sounds much better.
Does anyone know if there is some software/EQ that could zoom in on specific areas on the spectrum and be able to EQ (if possible, also cut out, pitch up or down) single bass hits?
>>52176899
audacity maybe
>>52176050
no one invented electronic music you idiot
>>52176725
if lambeth can be released, then why can't anything else? have hope anon.
>>52176941
Lambeth was already played in full. Stairwell and Feral Witchchild were only played in snippets and that was 7 years ago. They could be gone by now.
>>52176899
As in, draw a box between 50-100hz in a 0.1 second length and manipulate that without affecting the rest?
>>52176916
if there's lot's of high-end then that isn't really very effective though, or how did u mean?
I guess if you were to separate the low and high end manually and mash it up together in the end but that's too much of a hassle.
i was thinking more visually, like you cut it out of pic related and mess around with it individually
Name a more /bleep/ OST which is an actual OST and not a collection of tracks from known producers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGA4PilHdr0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYuESacPGAo
You can't.
>>52176252
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uwclzGZtrw
>>52177028
>like pic related
..
>>52177031
Why does /bleep/ hate albums?
>>52177130
Why does non-/bleep/ hate non-albums would be the more correct question.
>>52177028
digital sound doesnt work like that. if you had brick wall filters that only accentuate one frequency you would get hella aliasing artifacts
>>52177109
gross
>>52177031
half-life and portal
>inb4 it somehow is too intelligent even for you
>>52177200
>3S
>gross
>half-life and portal
>/bleep/
go back to /mu/ and/or /v/
>>52177147
Not really, most album releases also have single releases with them.
