I V vi IV
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
![220px-I-V-vi-IV_chord_progression_in_C[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/uBZKt3b.png "220px-I-V-vi-IV_chord_progression_in_C[1].png")
Why does this shit exist?
>>52108765
Well when you think about it, vi is a Tonic Substitute so it can be seen as T IV I V T
which makes a bit of sense
>>52108807
But why do all my happy accidents end up in this progression?
god that looks backwards. I hate it when band rely on a deceptive cadence though. Modern country usually introduces their bridges with one and it's just gross
>>52108830
>But why do all my happy accidents end up in this progression?
1. because the structure of your instrument
2. because of the nature of the harmonic series
>>52108869
A friggin' midi-ass keyboard?
> I V IV V
Even worse
>>52108765
>predominant after dominant in any way
>>52108765
I IV V I is a good one
I vi ii V I is GOAT. thanks based gershwin
>>52109013
you mean based everyone prior to him?!
Why does western tonality even exist?
>>52108765
My grandmother's clock does this
>>52109032
you don't got rhythm anon
>>52109039
Because of intelligent European composers.
