Okay...I know this is major statement, but Bjork's "Debut" is the best pop album of all time.
Am I right? Am I wrong? Why?
its so fucking dated
everything that bjork has ever done even the most recent stuff is so dated
Literally the worst Bork album
>>66281051
>its so fucking dated
yes
>everything that bjork has ever done even the most recent stuff is so dated
no
>>66281051
I can see why some of the instruments may sound a bit of their time, but I can get over it and even enjoy it! Just because it's from a different time doesn't make it bad!
>>66281140
I'd have to disagree with you on that one. It depends if you see her as an artist general or as an artist under one genre. Her later work is a lot more mature, but that makes me even more grateful that I can come back to this album. It's still Bjork, but it's a completely different, exciting, energizing Bjork.
>>66281265
well it's just that i don't really like dancepop and electro house
what the fuck in this thread
This album is very good, but Vulnicuta is the best album of her.
up
>>66281312
Oh...well then I totally understand your point of view.
>>66281332
I don't think it's the best one either. Vespertine takes #1 for me so far.
>>66281037
Don't worry OP, I agree with you.
Me mum's husband, on the other hand, thinks Homogenic is her best. Some songs on Debut really make you wonder why she put them on there however, because they are absolute shit. (There's more to life than this)
>>66281732
I concur
>>66281037
It's 6/10 for me. Post is so much better, sounds less dated too.
>>66281680
vulnicura is up there in the best
vespertine
Venus as a boy is so damn good
>>66282862
Other way around. I'd say Post is a 6/10.
Also, anyone who says something sounds "dated" are probably incapable of enjoying new jack swing or freestyle. I can't take anything they say seriously.
