> tfw you find out a musician you like is incredibly stupid
How did you find out that he is stupid?
>>66133733
I listened to him talk for about 3 minutes.
>>66133733
They’re trying to make everybody Fuckin’ gay,” he told TheQuietus “That’s what I think. They’re putting it on our culture. They’re putting it everywhere. Gay stuff is everywhere. I think they’re just doing it to make a monetary gain. They’re not doing it for the gays. They’re not really fans of the gays. They’re doing it for monetary gain. They try to make money off these people, man.
“You got cartoons that have gays,” he adds. “These are kids. Let kids make their own decision if they wanna go that way. Six- and seven-year-olds, five-year-olds shouldn’t be turned onto gay cartoon when their mind not even developed yet. What if they like how that cartoon talk? Now, you’re forcing them to be gay. Every TV show is gays. They’re kissing each other. It’s out of hand.”
Despite all of this, Tibet claims he doesn’t have animosity towards the LGBT community. “I don’t hate gay people at all,” he says. “I know plenty gay people, but don’t force it on ’em to be gay. Don’t do that. I just feel like that’s wrong.”
Later in the interview, however, Tibet claims he would use violence on his children if they opened up about being gay. “First, I’ma try to slap his ass back straight,” he says. “I’ma kick his ass. Maybe he’ll realize that he’s not gay. But if I can’t stop him from being gay, I’m not gonna ban my son from my life. I’ll just have to find some crazy ass way to deal with it. But my sons love women.”
>>66133853
thats surprising
I kind of imagined everyone in the neo-folk, industrial scene as gay
>>66133985
That's a Boosie quote you dip
>>66133853
>>66133985
these are lil boosie quotes lmao
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7uFFF51uqk
I like him and his art but he's just making this shit up on the spot
>>66133853
Other than the last paragraph, how is any of that wrong? Do you actually think all the media and mega corporations are now all about gay pride out of the collective kindness of their hearts, and not because some sweaty fat men in a boardroom found out that it was economically beneficial?
>>66135148
Some of it is genuine, some of it is for economical reasons. At least that's likely. You can't be certain about this sort of thing However, their objective isn't to make people gay.
>fuck off man I did Latin
v k /video-2996299_145843509
i dont know if i was surprised or not
>>66136560
>"Ice Cream For Crow"
>Letterman: Yeah. What does that mean exactly, that title?
>"It has a lot to do with Reagan. I mean, he saddle-soaps his hair and tosses jelly beans through rope tricks. He's a bad actor.
