Visiting Mount Rushmore soon. Post presidential pones.
>>27809135
Please, no currently in-elected candidates, insane demagogues or otherwise. No Trump or Sanders pones under any circumstances. Hillary pones are acceptable only if accompanied by Bill pones.
>>27809145
>in-elected
Damn autocorrect. Meant "un-elected".
There are far too few ponies in MAGA hats
>>27809145
What do you mean? He's already won.
>>27809168
It ain't over until Election Day.
>>27809168
>down in every poll
>losing in landslide according to Moody's famously accurate forecast
>won
I hate Clinton tbqh, but all the anal wreckage when she wins with over 300 electoral votes is gonna be divine.
I'm pretty sure a political argument, is what OP was trying to avoid.
>>27809205
>>down in every poll
source
>>27809145
>no trump
>no sanders
>clinton allowed
>>27809243
Only when accompanied by Bill. On her own, she's not allowed.
>>27809236
Fucks sake I'm the only one appeasing fucking OP
>>27809250
I'll bite
First off, her lead is not absolute, secondly these graphs show that ratings will go up and down and when the two of them converge- shown in the green circles -Trump started off still being lower in the first, matching her neck and neck in the second two, and finally surpassing her in the forth.
This site doesn't even account for the people who will vote on election day and didn't participate in any political polls.
There's also the fact that Clinton is likely to get indicted before the race ends, leaving Trump unopposed. So don't act like a Clinton presidency is a surefire deal.
>>27809318
>lol the RCP average means nothing it won't be like this on Election Day
>he can win with zero ground game and no money
>muh indictment
Tell that to Romney and McCain. Look, when fivethirtyeight, RCP, and Moody's all day you're toast, you're toast. And if Clinton gets indicted Trump is even more fucked, Sanders, Biden, and Warren slaughter him in favorability data.
>>27809354
You know what I e noticed?
The dems are just as stupid, inept, and corrupt as the GOP.
It really doesn't matter who becomes President. Their function is not to wield power, but to distract attention away from it.
The only difference between the donkey party and the elephant party is the promises they make to get themselves elected to office.
Once in office, they both do the same thing.
They work assiduously to feather their own nests while giving We The People the finger.
Argue all you want, we're fucked either way.
>>27809354
>muh indictment
You're absolutely right, looks like I'm a #shillforhill now
>Tell that to Romney and McCain
With McCain, things weren't as fucked back then. Nobody knew Obama as well as we do now, and everybody fucking hated Romney, even the Repubs, so voter turnout was laughable. Even with that, he still got pretty close because of the people who hated Obama. Guess what, people hate Clinton even more. Both of them had no where near the cult-like following that Trump does now.
>Look, when fivethirtyeight, RCP, and Moody's all day you're toast, you're toast.
Appeal to authority, not an argument.
>And if Clinton gets indicted Trump is even more fucked, Sanders, Biden, and Warren slaughter him in favorability data.
Sanders couldn't even beat Clinton with Reddit literally throwing their wallets at the screen, Biden has completely fallen off the radar and been forgotten about, and as for Warren, who the jumping jack fuck is that?
Trump has a fantastic chance at winning the race, don't deny it.
>>27809399
>Their function is not to wield power, but to distract attention away from it.
Lifted word for word from the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. And it isn't really true, post-FDR the executive branch has wielded significant power.
>The only difference between the donkey party and the elephant party is the promises they make to get themselves elected to office.
I see you've seen the 'Douche v Turd' episode of South Park as well.
>Once in office, they both do the same thing
In foreign policy, yes. Realist policy is the way the world works, so it's how everyone does things. But domestically they differ sharply. The Democrats will never pass a """""""""religious freedom""""""""" bill and Republicans will never pass a Financial Transaction Tax.
>>27809201
mfw i made this meme
>>27809258
OP here. Thanks. Everyone else seems intent on bringing /pol/ crap here.
I was hoping that by excluding ponified candidates that haven't (or haven't yet) won the Presidency, that would help minimize it. I was wrong.
>>27809443
>Trump has a fantastic chance at winning the race, don't deny it
>polls mean nothing, and arguing that they do and that their agreement is significant isn't a real argument because reasons
>my memetastic candidate can't lose, you're just in denial
>even though he's making no effort to turn out the groups that will vote for him turnout will be better than expected
>lol who even is Warren, I only read Breitbart News so I have no idea she's in strong contention to be Clinton's VP pick because she's the best orator in America, not even remotely corrupt, and just as progressive as Sanders
If this is the level of denial and butthurt we'll be seeing come November 5th, I can't wait.
>>27809581
>I'm in denial
Hello, Kettle? Yes this is Pot, you're a nigger!
>>27809581
what the fuck is this post
stupid mobile posters
>>27809622
>he doesn't realize that since the analogy is 'pot calling the kettle black', he's just insulting himself
Anon stop, my sides hurt.
>>27809135
>>27809168
>Nyxfag supports Trump
>>27809491
Presidents don't pass laws, Congress does. If it's change you want, then focus attention on the legislature. The president is just a figurehead.
>>27809664
...you done yet? Odd how you're so eager to say Trump will lose, yet voter turnout for the Repubs is higher than it's ever been. He is more popular than Bush ever was, and when Bush won he wasn't even dealing with any Demo canidates that were being investigated by the FBI for allowing Top Secret information to be stolen.
Just say it, Trump is a viable candidate. All the Jew York Times and Huffington Post articles in the world won't change that. He has a shot.
>>27809800
Prseidents do have power, though. To name a few examples:
>They can sign bills passed by Congress into law, or veto them (effectively killing said bills if they passed by the skin of their teeth).
>They can appoint Justices to the Supreme Court (although, as the GOP has demonstrated, Congress does have to approve).
>They are the Commander-in-Chief of our military forces (and not only in wartime, as Congress alone can declare war).
>The executive order is also a popular alternative to laws when Congress refuses to get a damned thing done (like right now).
And this is, of course, just the President's explicit powers. They often (by virtue of winning the fucking Presidency) have enough political clout to convince the Congresscriiters (primarily those of the President's party, or those who are otherwise willing to listen) to write or vote on certain bills, as well as to negotiate with foreign powers.
>>27809201
Assassination attempt on Twilight Sparkle
>>27809902
Look, if it was April, you would have had a point. But Trump isn't actually running a campaign anymore. He isn't raising money, or putting out ads, or working to get a ground game going that can turn out angry white people at the same rate the Democrats will be turning out angry black people and Hispanic people, he isn't changing his style to be more presidential, he's fumbling his way through finding a VP pick and alienating his base while Clinton's VP search is bringing Sanders supporters back into the fold, there are just so many things he's fucking up that he can't win. He'll get about 40% of the vote, lose the electoral college, and fade into history as the man who singlehandedly destroyed the GOP. The Moody's model prediction was the nail in the coffin, they correctly called every state in 2012 and have a 90% success rate in predicting elections since they started in 1980. You had a good run, but tue days when you can win an election solely with the backing of white working class men are over.
https://www.economy.com/dismal/topics/election-model
>>27810017
Keep crying cuck. You can shill all you want but you can't predict the future.
Here are America's real rulers:
Goldman Sachs
Lockheed Martin
Exxon Mobil
The Koch Bros.
Honestly, I don't understand why Trump is running, the White House is both a pay cut and a loss of prestige and influence to him.
I guess he's just using this campaign to build his brand.
>>27810052
>whines constantly
>tells me to keep crying
Stay buttmad senpai, elections are a numbers game, and the numbers say Trump is fucked.
>>27810172
All this arguing really won't matter until November comes around.
I have enough Trump images to do this all day.
>>27809549
I`m sorry OP. This was a cool idea for a thread, and as a Pip Brit, I was excited about hearing about excitement for Rushmore, but the others arn`t quite the most self aware, are they?
>>27809936
>Attempt
Look up February 16, 2013
>>27810203
We're probably going to have to deal with this for at least four or five months after the election results.
>>27810203
>>27810222
>let's make a thread about US presidents but it totally won't be political
OP brought this on himself. Sympathy isn't in order.
>>27810203
You should read "Hartison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut.
Then you will understand why the liberal ideology of equality is the road to perdition.
>>27810239
During an election year, no less. What a tool.
Best President.
>>27811703
That's not how you spell Theodore Roosevelt.
>>27811703
>>27809243
Hes allowing Clinton only with Bill because he's been president before.
>>27811703
>>27811724
>not Jackson
>>27811749
>Not Underwood
>>27810219
Underrated
>>27811749
>Andrew 'I accidentally the economy' Jackson
>Andrew 'lol why try to ha e a stable currency' Jackson
>Andrew 'let's just not enforce that binding Supreme Court decision because I don't like it' Jackson
>best
>president
Speak softly and carry a chicken.
