Pone version of Huniepop when?
What a shitty game that doesn't deserve any penny.
Not that it could be hard to replicate with all the porn art on DB.
>>26015412
Admit it. If they made a ponified version, you'd shell out some shekels for it.
>>26015444
nope, I'd download it. I'll never spend money for pony porn.
>>26015412
Have a message from best gril:
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1qwZ2UDbw4G
>>26015507
The tsunderest of tsunderes.
B-Baka!
>>26015412
Fuck you, the game was fun. And I mean the gameplay.
>>26015397
This tobehonestfamilia
>>26015507
this to be quite honest family
>>26015397
>EQG version of Huniepop when?
FTFY
>>26016380
>tfw all the HP characters had more depth than the EQG girls (minus TS/SS)
>>26016468
But the EQG characters are literally the same characters as their pony counterparts, save for the fact that they're bipedal humanoids.
Are you saying the mane 6 have no depth? I will fite you.
>>26016536
>the EQG characters are literally the same characters as their pony counterparts
Now you're not even trying.
>>26016560
How are they not the same characters, family?
Sure, they don't have the same life experiences, but they have the same personalities and character traits.
>>26016536
Wrong, they are not literally the same. In their human versions, they're all reduced to a simple diorama of their personalities. Rarity is all like "Dresses! Oh dresses dresses, also outfits? Outfits!", Rainbow Dash is "I'm amazing and this is so awesome! *3* AWESOME!", Pinkie is a weird pink version of flubber that just screams random shit. Sure, the movies are just 90 minutes and they don't focus on the main six, they're about Twilight and Sunset + the villains, because they simply have more time in the show to flesh them out more, but you in the movies, their personalities are paper-thin. Imagine watching the movies without knowing about the show. When judging a movie, the source material is ALWAYS to be neglected, the movie has to stand by itself. And there are other 90-minute movies that are doing a better job with fleshing out side characters.
>>26016604
>but you in the movies
*but in the movies
>>26016604
True, if you judge the movie entirely on its own merits, the characters are but shallow archetypes.
However, there's a whole five season show supporting the three movies, where the characters are fully fleshed out and realized. When you saw the EQG films, you didn't see Pinkie Pie as some random party girl with pink hair. You saw her as a bipedal version of her more developed equine counterpart, as did I.
The films don't exist in a vacuum, anon.
>>26016657
>where the characters are fully fleshed out and realized
Still not entirely correct. Maybe the human version are actually just vapid bitches. SciTwi proves, that the "original human version" and the Equestrian version of the same person can have quite different characters. And we do not know if that's the case for the main six. Original human version and Equestrian version in the human world can coexist and interact with each other, therefore we can't say more that both share SOME traits of their personalities. But not all.
The pony-main six are well fleshed out characters with five seasons to support their character development. Not the human versions.
>>26016695
>SciTwi proves, that the "original human version" and the Equestrian version of the same person can have quite different characters.
Yeah, that's a pretty good point. I forgot about SciTwi.
Still, I find it hard to separate the ponies from the EQGs in terms of them being different characters. To me, they're the same substance, only with different forms.
>>26015507
That sounds nothing like Aiko you stupid
>>26016788
I mean, you're not wrong, and yeah, that's exactly what they WANTED to do with them, but it just didn't work out that well. So, per intetion, they're supposed to be the same characters. They just didn't turn out to be if you look a little bit closer.