Why should I care about people's books and pretend to care about their aspects of the human condition when no one cares about the fact that I can't get girls because I'm a non Chad and they think I'm a bad person just for bringing this up?
Seems hypocritical to me.
Seem like they want all the attention and money for themselves.
>>8256461
>Why should I care about people's books and pretend to care about their aspects of the human condition
because it's fun!
Is it a bad sign when these frogposter /r9k/ routines that appear lately are among the more interesting threads on /lit/?
Who is 'they' ?
Lulubyebye
>>8256461
There's more to life than girls friendo.
>A recent US Government study found that just 44 per cent of teenage girls have had sex, compared to 58 per cent 25 years ago. For boys, a similar pattern emerged, with 47 per cent having had sex, compared to 69 per cent among their parents when they were at the same age.
Girls are less likely to have sex than you, and Chad's odds are longer now than they were 25 years ago.
This thread isn't lit, so since you don't care about books, you're not going to get your dick sucked here.
>>8256461
>why should i care about other humans at all because i can't get girls to like me
You know that the project of caring about other human's "condition" is really going in the opposite direction of you being able to attain someone's affection right? Of course understanding other human's condition can help you make friends but, dude, it's not like a tool to get girls to fuck you. Like work out or something if you want a hobby that directly makes you more attractive to women.
