Ever read some philosophican stuff, that blew your brain apart?
>>8256373
yes, ebola (wtf lmao) and stirner (lol spooks) and neatche (so edgy)
>>8256381
Stop trying to force this lame ass Nirvana guy into memedom and go the fuck back to /mu/. You guys don't even shitpost right.
>>8256373
>What, if some day or night a demon were to steal after you into your loneliest loneliness and say to you: 'This life as you now live it and have lived it, you will have to live once more and innumerable times more' ... Would you not throw yourself down and gnash your teeth and curse the demon who spoke thus? Or have you once experienced a tremendous moment when you would have answered him: 'You are a god and never have I heard anything more divine.
Blew my mind, changed my life.
>>8256509
>blah blah blah
>live every day like it's your last
>blah blah blah
>>8256624
You can't call a cliche's origin cliche.
>>8256509
eternal recurrence is silly. If I don't remember my shitty life with every reiteration of it, then how do I experience it more than once?
>>8256373
Reading Kant, and actually understanding him, was one long experience in which my brain was blown apart.
nope.
everytime i've "discovered" something new in philosophy it was just something i had already felt and some german guy just wrote it in a cool way.
>>8256880
>Neechee came up with the idea of carpe diem
t. average /lit/ poster
>>8256892
Is this really your understanding of it?
Spinoza, Schopenhauer, and Wittgenstein really blew my mind and are my favourite.
Which philosophers overheated my brain and popped my eyes with the density of his writing?
>Aquinas: What level of density are you on?
>Kant: idk like 3 or 4 maybe
>Aquinas: Your like a baby, watch this
>>8256924
>why must I be human?
>why couldn't I just be a stone or a fish?
>>8256937
Well not if its analogical but if its actually supposed to be accepted as a metaphysical cnsideration then yes, absolutely. If only because of the latter deconstruction its hard to take the former seriously at all.
