Rank the arts according to your taste.
Mine:
Literature > Music > Painting > Film > Sculpture > Theatre > Architecture
literature > film > theatre > music > sculpture > painting > architecture
where do video games rank?
>>8236239
>>8236228
I wouldn't rank artforms, but I do believe that sculpture is the purest form of art because it is completely subtractive from the medium. 100% creation by subtraction, like controlled destruction of the medium.
>>8236246
Most of it*.
Some of modern sculpture wrecks with your Renaissance man ideas.
>>8236228
prose fiction > painting > drama > installation art > theatre > sculpture > film > media art > craft art > music > poetry > architecture > television > non-fiction > performance art > musical theatre
architecture > literature > music > painting > sculpture > film > theatre
>>8236271
You dropped this
>>8236239
Video games are a mix of artforms, they don't really fit into these lists.
>>8236228
Film > Literature > Music > Painting > Architecture > Sculpture > Theathre
>not realizing music is the purest form of art
>>8236228
No photography?
>>8236306
thanks. you were really great in Hairspray, chad.
>>8236228
literature > painting > music > sculpture > film > architecture > theatre
>>8236411
don't know much about photography, actually thought about making a thread asking for recommendations on serious photography last night when I was falling asleep, just remembered
who's the michelangelo of photography?
music > literature > painting > theatre > chess problems > architecture > sculpture > calligraphy > video games > dance > film > photography
>>8236417
I really like toshio shibata, thought about buying one of his prints once, they're like 1000 dollars though
not sure if he's a great artist though
>Sculpture
>Painting
>Architecture
>Literature
>Music
>Theatre
>Film
>>8236417
Todd Hido, Patrick Joust and Wouter Van de Voorde are some of my favorite contemporary photographers.
>who's the michelangelo of photography?
Not qualified enough to answer that question, sorry. Try /p/.
>>8236417
lit > music > architecture > sculpture > theatre > painting > film
>>8236453
I just checked /p/ and none of it seemed related to fine art, also appears to be a slow board
this really doesn't look like great art to me, more as if a teenage mind had produced it and thought it was really important
I don't really have a fixed taste in photos yet but I generally don't like things that are overblown or grainy, probably why I like shibata
cognitive art > visual art > temporal art
>Rank the arts according to your taste.
What did he mean by this?
>>8236474
>I just checked /p/ and none of it seemed related to fine art
I mean't starting a thread on fine art and checking back later.
>more as if a teenage mind had produced it and thought it was really important
https://youtu.be/Lg98qwI2Mio That's not the case, thought you may interpret it that way.
Perhaps you might enjoy the works of Andreas Gursky. Quite a famous photographer.
>>8236390
t. Schopenhauer
photography
poetry
painting
sculpture
television
theatre
literature
music
video games
film
architecture
>>8236529
There are a couple of people who are decent. 35mmbandit is quite good.
>>8236228
Lit>film>theatre>music>painting>sculpture>architecture
>>8236559
I follow photographers mainly on Tumblr, Insta, Facebook and Flickr.
I'm unaware of any website which curate photography, if you are a Tumblr user (I doubt it and expect backlash), you can follow or browse selected works here: input-invalid.tumblr.com/
>>8236578
>if you are a Tumblr user (I doubt it and expect backlash)
I'm not, but I suppose I'll have a look
>>8236228
Visual, auditory and performing
>>8236590
William Broadhurst and Kate Molenkamp produce high quality work. They're both from my home state if you're interested.
>>8236559
janson's history of art includes art photography from its origins to 1980 more or less, you can find a pretty good list of names there.
>>8236654
thanks
>>8236631
again, looks too arranged and overblown, too "scenic"
I think I like photos that are self-aware (lo-fi is terrible, probably), but not highly "aesthetic", as in, the laguna, the hill, the chairs, especially the steam aswell as the light, but I suppose it's an improvement over those art-y houses
>>8236239
>rank your favorite kinds of food
>where does poop rank?
this is you
>>8236228
>>8236238
>>8236271
>>8236371
>>8236527
>>8236567
>architecture this low
Lit > Film > music
>>8236228
>Music
>
>
>powergap
>
>Poetry
>Literature
>Painting
>Sculpture
>Architecture
>Theatre
>
>
>
>turbo-ultra-gap
>
>film
>>8236228
music>literature>architecture>theatre>film>painting>sculpture
what a stupid idea for a thread
>>8236228
Fucking pseuds
>>8236228
Gesamtkunstwerk > poetry > music > architecture > prose > drama > painting > sculpture >>>>> modern ""art"""
Architecture > Film > Music > Literature > Painting > Theater > Sculpture
music>literature>film>painting>theater>sculpture>architecture
Boom, done.
>>8236228
I can't properly evaluate theater because I'm a poorfag, meaning I either a) read a play's manuscript or b) watch the film version.
Novels > animation > live-action film > comics > music > television > paintings > short stories > video games > photography > poetry > sculpture > architecture > pornography
video games is so high not because it's artistically superior but because OP said "according to your tastes" which I interpret as "how much you enjoy it"
I literally can't. I know a few art forms deeply and I see how each of them offers experiences that no other can. They are too different to be compared.
>>8236390
It is, but is purity good?
>>8236228
Music > cinema/theatre > bodybuilding > stand up comedy > fine art > video games > sculpture > literature > architecture > modern art
A straight line is stupid. Let's think of it as an axis of speed in which data is delivered (where visuals is the apex), how much attention it calls to the mind (aural beats the others) and how prompt it is to call for meaning and remembrance (symbolic stuff beats all); lastly a medium also can have a negative value, i.e. which of the aforementioned axises it doesn't deal with.
So for example read literature is almost purely symbolic with a vestige of aural, and usually no visuals; as such it delivers meaning and memory almost perfectly, but slowly, and requires attention. Music calls to attention and emotion by its very nature, and optionally has language in it; like literature though, it has a fixed, set time. Single images are timeless, and can have meaning in various ways, but by their immediate nature they can be disregarded easily and can take a lot of attention to understand and perceive throughly.
vidya (hasn't been done properly yet) > cinema > music > architecture > literature
sculpture and painting are ancillary to architecture
theatre is obsolete
>>8236228
OP I agree entirely with your order. It's unsettling. Do you think we're star crossed lovers?
anyone here who puts architecture anywhere else than the top three has a plebian concept of art
>>8238641
no u
>>8236228
Literature > Music > Film > Painting > Sculpture > Architecture > Theatre
I am a pleb when it comes to theatre, so I don't know where to put it. Maybe it would rank higher if I got into it.
>>8238641
castles of the mind faggot
Music is the highest art, no question.
The tune "moonlight sonata" by Beethoven is my evidence.
Music=Lit=Art>Photography=Sculpture=Architecture>Theater=Film
All are derivative of the top 3 which aren't meaningfully comparable
>theatre
>not heavily related to literature
>all these idiots ranking not directly next to literature
what
I thought this board was /lit/
>>8237381
>architecture first
>sculpture last
nice logic
>>8236228
Literature = Theatre > Music > Painting = Sculpture > Architecture
I left film out because I know too little about film to be honest. I'm sure there's a lot of potential as a medium, but most of what I've seen has been worthless trash IMO.
>>8239367
Literature is the highest art, no question.
The book "Infinite Jest" by David Foster Wallace is my evidence.
Baroque music > Circa WW1 prose > Proto-modernist poetry > Late-imagist painting > Opera > Roman sculpture (imitating Greek originals) > English theatre > Vocal Rromantic music > Gothic revival / Venetian architecture
I probably forgot a few important artforms and eras, and didn't bother to list pleb shit.
>>8236228
Sculpture > sculpture > SCULPTURE? > Farming
>>8236228
memes>everything else
>>8236369
How is film not a mix of artforms?
>>8236228
Music > Painting > Film > Perfumery > Theatre > Sculpture = Design = Fashion = Architecture > Literature > Cuisine
>>8239607
videogames are mix of artistic and non-artistic elements
some games are legitimately artistic tho
>>8239380
They're hardly comparable. Architecture, which is the meeting of art, engineering, and philosophy, affects our lives in more ways than any of the other arts listed. It can in a moment create an atmosphere of romance, wonder, and excitement, and at the other end of the spectrum it can make one depressed and listless. Sculptures, however well done, are typically little more than decorations.
>>8239629
>perfumery > literature
kek
>your taste
>i.e. what you've been exposed to the longest
painting for the information, music for the feeling, literature for the communion
>>8239643
prove me i'm wrong litfag
>>8239659
prove me how you are right, /lgbt/fag
