Why does /lit/ hate this book and Ayn Rands philosophy? I really liked it and I think there's nothing wrong with it. It's nothing evil like socialism or communism.
>>8232949
Obvious bait.
book it. liked I there's think wrong nothing Ayn communism. like philosophy? with this does socialism hate it lit It's or Rands and Why and I really evil nothing
think does really nothing this book socialism nothing with wrong there's evil liked and Ayn Rands it. Why lit I It's like I hate philosophy? or and it communism.
like there's lit philosophy? it nothing Ayn socialism book I does Why It's this liked nothing wrong with and or think evil communism. Rands and hate I really it.
Ayn socialism communism. like and or nothing and it this It's evil think Why wrong does I hate there's Rands book I with philosophy? lit liked nothing it. really
>>8232949
>>8232949
>It's nothing evil like socialism or communism.
:^)
>>8232949
>philosophy
not her maschositic rape fantasies
Reading it today is cringeworthy.
iterally wrote a book about how she wants to be dominated by a strong man.
>>8234211
Same person.
Its actually interesting. I remember thinking when i was reading the book that the relationships between the man and woman was reminiscent of a romantic victorian novel.
Idealising against all odds romance that never comes to fruition.
both the woman and man cant be together not because the social realities prevent it but because they themselves are stoicly restricting themsleves and thus if they want to be true to themselves they cannot be together..
Its just a really dull build up for erotic purposes.
>>8232949
>!984 is praised by the public yet Atlas Shrugged is vilified
I don't like people
>>8234317
>a great book gets praised
>a lousy book gets shunned by everyone except dipshits
>there's something wrong with society
I hate you free-market libertarian retards so much.
BTW, the rugged individualist Ayn Rand relied on government handouts to make it by.
>>8232949
objectivism is kinda bs. that being said, she was a good writer. i just dont agree with her ideas. she did well with it tho, cant hate her for that.
>>8234384
>good writier
No. Her literary skills sucked dick.
ITT: Leftists who have never read Ayn Rand, or worked a day in their life, insult her books.
>>8234400
Double dubs speak truth. Her characters were cartoonishly wooden and 1-dimensional. Her plots were offensively childish. Her pacing was atrocious. And her style was reminiscent of a wealthy teenager who hates "takers."
>>8234411
>anyone who doesn't like Ayn Rand is a lazy libtard
>proving the detractors right that everyone who likes Ayn Rand is a dipshit
Smooth move, Ex Lax.
Think about it.
Her works are Post-Industrial Aristotelian Logic and English was not even her Native Language.
Zinov'yevna is Patrician all the way.
>>8234418
not an argument
>>8234540
is every conversation you have an argument? is it just the ones where it's an insult directed at you that you leave alone as "not an argument" and shut down inquiry on?
>>8232949
It needs more rape scenes to hold up her shitty writing; like Twilight it's not evil, but, unlike Twilight, which is still shit, it doesn't have enough rape or creeping scenes.
>>8232949
>JOB CREATORS ARE THE BEST THING EVER SO THEY SHOULD BE REVERED AND ENCOURAGED
>ignores the fact that the single biggest job creator/employer in almost any given state is the government
>>8236445
Doesn't mean the government are the most efficient way of harnessing Employees, I like her ideology if it was implemented correctly, unfortunately you get Walmart being the King and paying the servents pennies. That being said I don't think a strong company should be pulled down to allow a weak company that can't compete a chance of survival
>>8234553
>It needs more rape scenes
I would not be opposed to that.
>>8232976
>>8232984
>>8232989
>>8232991
what the fuck are you saying
>>8236445
Please go back to Rebbit, you leftist pseudo-Marxist
>>8236638
>government intervention
>marxist
LRN 2 POLITICAL THEORY
>>8236658
>>government intervention
>>marxist
>LRN 2 POLITICAL THEORY
Do you know how I know that you're not trolling but really are just plain stupid?
>>8236671
You're the retard.
Read actually socialist theory before trying to talk about it kiddo.
Why does lit still respond to this same defensive advertisement
>>8236682
>>8236671
that wasn't me, replying to you, some other dude
but really though the government is the biggest job creator
>>8236690
>but really though the government is the biggest job creator
That doesn't really mean anything, though. The number of civilians the private sector employs vastly outnumbers the amount the government does.
Which is the best edition to get?
>TFW literally just bought The Fountainhead
