![77463395[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Mgxj1pn.jpg "77463395[1].jpg")
So I know we have a pretty big contingent of /r9k/-posters on here, which is why I propose that we start a reading group. Everyone else who happen to share redpilled views in this regard are of course welcome.
This group would have as its focus "anti-women reading" and we'd go through famous works by authors such as Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Weininger etc., and less known authors such as Elliot Rodger, not to mention utterly unknown but perceptive comments made by anonymous posters on 4chan's /r9k/ and /pol/ boards that I've collected over the past year or so.
If you have any interest in joining this group then let me know, and I will start compiling a reading list.
Do feel free to make suggestions on anti-women readings in this thread as well.
Needless to say, women aren't allowed.
Thanks. And please keep discussion civil. If you don't agree with this for some reason, then hide this thread and post somewhere else. We don't need you.
Women are God's masterpiece.
>>8221056
Go fuck yourself.
>>8221073
>If you don't agree with this for some reason, then hide this thread and post somewhere else. We don't need you.
>>8221081
Woman is sacred; the woman one loves is holy.
this is just another misogyny thread masquerading as a literature thread
this board is becoming unbearable.
This thread is now dedicated to posting great female authors.
frogniggers fuck off
She's mad, but she's magic. There's no lie in her fire.
Nietzsche didn't hate women, read The Dawn. He certainly hated feminine culture when it dominated society, but that's not quite the same thing, especially since part of his irritation with it is that he thought it held back great women.
>>8221096
>>8221096
>>8221096
>>8221112
>>8221096
>>8221096
Fuck yeah women
>>8221118
>>8221121
Frankenstein is a good work.
>>8221127
>>8221121
>authors who have created ACTUAL masterpieces.
so like pic related?
>>8221128
Yeah, I thought so too when I read it at 8 years old.
>>8221133
Do you even critique?
>>8221133
I read the Odyssey as the same age.
Please stop posting all these roastwhores.
You are just proving how inferior these women are too Dante, Shakespeare, Homer, Milton, Chaucer, Joyce, Pynchon/DFW, etc.
>>8221096
I would have tons of sex with Anne Sexton, if you know what I mean
>>8221141
A vast superior work, don't you think?
protip: written by a man
How is mccucumbers?
All I know is what flannery said about her.
I went for a piss & a square. Did OP abandon ship yet, or do I need to keep going?
>>8221172
You have proven nothing except how women are mere insects compared to men
ITT: OP gets BTFO
>>8221149
Homer doesn't have any equals outside of Dante and Shakespeare, so compared to the ratio of the how many female writers there were over three thousand years with male writers, and taking one of their extraordinary best, not really an appropriate comparison.
>>8221183
Keep telling yourself that, sweetheart.
This isn't the first tumblr invasion I've seen
>>8221195
>tumblr
There is no tumblr invaser. /lit/izens are just enlightened and living in the [CURRENT YEAR]. Even our traditionalists are above your /r9k/-tier alt-right.
>>8221178
Oh, I'm not trying to prove anything.
I just wanted to troll you because I love my mama & my grandmas & my sisters & my aunts & my cousins & my nieces & my friends & for a time I loved my exes as well. I love all the authors I posted. Women are okay by me.
If you had half the balls you pretend to, you'd dox yourself so we could have an anti-you thread. Alas...
Why are bookfags so bluepilled? Does reading actually make you gay?
>>8221201
/lit/ is mostly redpilled. This is an anomaly.
Must be shills
>>8221195
>People who were on /lit/ before robots CULTURALLY ENRICHED us are tumblr
>>8221206
/v/ is that way sweety
>>8221208
/lit/ was mostly leftists until this year senpai
>>8221208
>>8221211
>Redpilled!
>Tumblr!!!
>WAAAAAAAAH
>WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
If you can't sustain an argument without resort to internet memes, you might as well throw yourself from a bridge now & help humanity conserve it's resources.
>>8221203
>Women are okay by me.
Please leave this thread.
>>8221223
I'm the second post you linked, and im telling him that the robots are the invaders, not leftists.
>>8221223
>t. Raquisha 'the cultural marxist' Esparanza
>>8221227
Naw man, women are pretty cool. They have round butts and write good books.
>>8221227
Nah, I like it in here - it's very comfy what with all these amazing female authors. Can you imagine how awesome it's going to be when we start posting women artists, politicians, scientists, inventors, teachers, actors etc.
I think I'll stick around.
>>8221227
have you looked at the thread?
What's wrong with hating women?
>>8221239
>he still believes that cultural marxism is a thing
LMAO
>>8221244
Sounds comfy.
>>8221240
this
>>8221208
Only because /r9k and /pol invaded our fucking board this year
>>8221246
It's irrational, something a woman would do.
>>8221246
it's logically incoherent
>>8221239
>He likes women
>OMG CULTURAL MARXIST
>WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
>I resort to internet meme culture to win my arguments
>Somebody, any body, love me p-p-puhlease...
>Robots can't get gf
>Proceed to blame other people rather than trying to improve themselves
C L A S S I C
>>8221267
dumb frogposter
We need mods with teeth to start cutting out the cancerous parts of this board before the whole thing does. First on the chopping black should be /r9k/ freaks. /pol/ can go after that.
>>8221073
Take a moment to look at some of those titles and then post your nonsense
>Hey, OP. I thought you're really cute. Maybe sometime we can get together for a drink & discuss our favorite authors.
>Then later after I fuck your brains out, you can tell me all about how much you hate me while I languidly stroke your masculine chest.
>Whaddya say bigboy, hmm??
>>8221283
Please for the love of God. Mods please
Why do we need mods? So far this thread has gone swimmingly.
Don't appeal to authority to censor topics you find distasteful. That's pussy shit. Just flood it with counter-arguments & let the chips fall.
>>8221096
/r9k/posters are so boring, please stop posting
>>8221305
k guys going on break, I'll do more if the thread hasn't been deleted later. Barely even started on artists.
>Tfw the bait thread just turns into mutual edge-signalling between misogynists and philogynists
I'm admittedly the former, but I'm not edgy about it. I genuinely find women to be more trouble than they're worth, in a number of regards - but whether the problem is innate to their sex, or whether it's some consequence of modernity, I cannot say. Do I think it is down to some sort of inferiority on their part? At times, but I also take the (often misunderstood) Schopenhaurian/Nietzchean approach, that the average woman is a terrible - but in certain circumstances, they can even exceed we men. I'll believe it when I see it, however.
Having had several relationships, my longest being 3 years, I have tacitly sworn off women in recent years. Part of the reason is simply because I no longer care to "dumb myself down" for the sake of happiness. I have yet to encounter my intellectual equal (or dare I say, superior) in any female.
This is not limited to females. I barely even have any friends because I cannot stand whatever banal and mediocre things attract their interest. I have found some exceptions in my fellow men, and have 'acquaintances' by all means, but never yet in a female - and in the most sincere why possible, I do wonder why this is.
I arrived at my conclusions in the most indifferent/objective manner possible. Not only that, but they are also considerate - I think it is kinder to remain alone than to 'trick' a woman into a relationship by essentially living a lie, and being untrue to myself (and her) to fulfil certain needs (and wants). Far from being 'edgy', I am positively aloof when putting it into action.
I'll *tip* myself out.
>>8221314
Can't wait. See ya senpai
>>8221314
>>8221323
OP, I understand it must be hard for you to get laid, being born with the top of your head shaped like a fedora. It's okay. Here's what you do- kill yourself, before any poor woman has to put herself through the misery of being anywhere near you
>>8221320
>The problem is everyone else, despite the fact that I alone am the only common factor.
I appreciate the articulate response, but your fundamental lack of self-awareness is so off-putting & renders irrelevant anything else you might say.
>>8221307
There is no point in counter arguments. this thread, so I believe, was made for a few men to come together and to discuss things they like. In this case their like in the dislike of women. A good thing to study.
You people are merely shills for the FIDF who doesn't want people to enjoy things that you don't like. You are easy to ignore.
OP we should organize through a google group or something. I participated in a similar reading circle on Italian /lit/.
>>8221327
>>8221320
Nice blog post. Also, if your going to say you're not edgy then don't turn around and brag about your pseudo intellectual fuck-you-jack-im-all-right attitude.
>>8221320
>females
>>8221341
>>8221340
FIDF?
>>8221329
Anon, please. Avoid the "never get laid" arguments. It's immature & it insinuates that women are primarily fickle broodmares, thereby re-enforcing the OP.
>>8221245
Unlike you I have looked at the OP. Spam is part of 4chan and easily looked over, especially when only one sweaty fempseud does it.
>>8221320
>I arrived at my conclusions in the most indifferent/objective manner possible
this, aside from obvious misogyny, seems to be your problem.
>>8221340
Wrong again, putz. There are literally thousands of places on the internet where this noxious ideology is discussed.
/lit/ is for the discussion of literature, not an open forum for pernicious weasles to vomit up their troglodytic grunts & attempt to rally the other pillowhumpers to their cause.
>>8221372
yr the only trip user i've liked on /lit/
The upside is: as women are inherently inferior to men there are not so many that she can post. As hard as she tries to put it to max bump count, she'll ultimately fail.
>>8221333
I wish I could say I'm blowing my own trumpet, or have some sort of over-inflated ego, but I don't overestimate myself. That said, I am honest about myself - and following the aforementioned Schopenhauer's advice, I do not engage in false humility.
>>8221342
I knew the post would be perceived in some way edgy, given how this thread has gone. Just thought I'd humour people.
>>8221346
English is not my first language. 'Women' sounds odd where I am from.
>>8221372
>putz.
(((Fugitivo)))
Let us please discuss misogynistic literature. You are actively hindering this thread, please make your own.
>>8221387
where are you from?
>>8221397
kys pseud
Now this is how you transform a garbage bait thread into a good one. Well done /lit/.
Also thanks to
>>8221215
>>8221268
this (or these) anons for these pics. Didn't know these authors, makes me want to learn Japanese even more.
>>8221397
>I think he going to reply to legitimately mediocre female authors
>Nope, it's all of them
Once again robots prove that socializing isn't the only thing they can't do right.
>>8221353
I guess Female Internet Defense Force
Its a stale meme
>>8221393
South Africa.
>>8221391
The OP said he wished to discuss Eliot Rodgers as well as anti-women posts made by anons on. Not literature. Not on my watch.
And nobody has stopped you from doing such btw. In fact I openly defended your right to do it. By all means, proceed.
>>8221397
>I'm intimidated by others who disagree with my backwater apprehension of human society
>Instead of questioning my self & my motivations I'll just call them Tumblerinas
>That'll show 'em!
>WAAAAAAAAAAAAH
>>8221387
An edgelord never feels his own edge, and you're probably the edgiest person in this thread so far.
>>8221056
Make a Google group, then we can simply remove the detractors.
>>8221432
Nietzsche was also an edgelord, yet will be remembered long after you're dead and forgotten.
>>8221438
Why'd we do that. The only reason to talk about this stuff is to piss off nu-male.
>>8221430
>we'd go through famous works by authors such as Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Weininger etc.
Seems to be literature. The manifesto by Rodgers is technically also literature and certain posts can be considered an art form as well.
>I'm intimidated by others who disagree with my backwater apprehension of human society
Loads of assumptions.
OP, I'll make the same thread in a few hours. She cannot be awake all day.
>>8221449
hi slugwizard
why does everyone have to act so childish?
>>8221096
>>8221453
You know it's more than one person, right? It's at least three.
>>8221449
I think it's a genuinely interesting project.
>>8221056
But Nietzche didn't hate women
Are frogposters this downie? Are they just bad with reading comprehension? Both?
>>8221469
reading is for fags and jews
>tfw when this just a ruse to create a recthread without people saying 'read the wiki'
I love this thread.
>>8221478
>>tfw when
fuck
>>8221449
ressentiment at its finest.
nietzsche would laugh.
>>8221478
t b h the only reason I have a lot of these pictures is from making the female authors chart. Was originally going to do portraits instead of book covers.
>>8221443
>I'm not edgy
> (Actually you are)
>No one will remember you, nothing personnel kid!
Being that I'm dead after I die, I couldn't care less if I'm remembered a century from now or not.
>>8221490
Not the person you were responding to. I just don't see how 'edgy' is a good criticism.
Anyone who creates a thread on an anonymous anime image board asking for a safe space because they can't handle conflict should just kill themselves immediately.
>>8221397
What wit! What insight!
What say you famous female authors, how might one even begin to formulate a riposte to an argument born of such sagacity?
Alas, I fear it is too late. That your collective experiences, ideas and passions -- worked onto page after page without the means of thoughtful consideration -- have here, today, in this wondrous moment, been rendered forever obsolete by the greatest, manifest of wisdom -- modern man.
Rejoice with me sisters! for you have met your match and been surpassed, overcome, and moment is not one for weeping, but one for gratitude -- gratitude that we have played such a part in reaching this truth with existential consequence. Rejoice.
>>8221121
You're such a huge faggot.
Also lolling @ all the frogposters who are, by extension, saying their mothers are giant whores.
>>8221489
can you post the chart?
>>8221496
It's a good criticism because he said he wasn't edgy, before being edgy. My criticism is that he incredibly unaware that he's the most pretentious rugged individual in the thread why claiming to be otherwise. Re read the reply chain, you can figure it out.
>>8221512
*highfive* roflmao r9k blown the fuck out
>>8221246
I agree Aristotle didn't think too highly of the fairer sex. Breeding and companionship were their main purpose
>>8221513
Sure, anon.
I'm saving all these pictures for the next time this thread happens.
>>8221524
And here's the thread that originally spawned it. Might have some I haven't posted yet in it, and it definitely has more information. I'm kind of low-efforting this because I'm scanning a book right now too.
Fuck off.
Would everyone please report these threads
>>8221512
>saying their mothers are giant whores
Isn't yours?
Maybe you were an orphan.
Okay sorry I had to wander off for a bit.
Since >>8221453 has conceded their loss, I feel like this thread was a success in more ways than one.
Final thoughts:
Sure, some women are insipid harlots, but so are some men. Being a piece of shit isn't gender exclusive. If you choose to come on my home-board & push your bigoted agenda, I'm going to mock you & make derisive comments every single time - because that's the only thing that will wake you up from the fucking fantasy world you live in. So go ahead and make another post in a few hours. If I'm around, I'll come say howdy.
Personally, I love girls. For everything they are, for everything they're not. I don't deify them, because nobody is perfect. But neither will I legitimize bigotry in any form. Smell you guys later.
>>8221521
Most of those posts are pretty calm actually.
>>8221532
I always do.
>>8221531
part two. It was a nice thread.
>>8221532
Why? It's a dumb thread, sure, but it's entertaining.
>>8221531
What degenerate nu-male board was this from, hrrm?
/leftypol/?
Aristotle: women are the most licentious of the two sexes.
>>8221542
wow, what an pleasant and rational discussion of female authors! how is this possible on /lit/?
>2012
there we go.
>>8221524
Miss McaIntosh, my darling!
>>8221520
I know, right? This is why misogyny usually tries to have at least the Madonna/Whore dichotomy, but these weapons-grade ressentiment hyperlosers can't even think that far.
>>8221554
I still haven't tackled that one yet.
I wish /r9k/ would put its money where its mouth is and just commit suicide already
another troll thread with 200+ relies
way to not reply /lit/
How'd we get this far without posting the Brontes yet
>>8221553
4chan has become noticeably more sexist and racist in the last few years.
I used to browse r9k when it had greentexts posted frequently. Some girl was telling interesting stories about working in a tattoo parlour, and one dude posted the usual "ugh muh women" shit and was unanimously told to fuck off
>>8221580
It turned out to be a good thread though.
>>8221582
4chan has always liked to troll about the touchy subjects. I'd be willing to bet most of the misogynist posters are trolls rather than genuine.
>>8221593
>Mira said as Mr Lin inserted his second fist.
>>8221588
some guy spamming pictures of women over a bunch of people arguing about misogyny isn't a "good thread"
>>8221606
kek
>>8221598
They aren't. It's genuinely much worse here now, filled with men who struggle with their masculine and racial identity who have become entrenched in bitterness. They are so convinced that they are righteous and justified in their hatred of women and non white men, but they don't realize that this hatred isolates them.
It's not just on 4chan either. I've seen this hatred get worse in men in real life too.
>>8221598
I'd be willing to bet the reverse. Pointless though as we can never be sure. As has been said before, 4chan posts can only be viewed through the lens of a sincere/insincere duality.
>>8221618
I'm my experience the racism was a lot worse in 2007 here
didn't notice the misogyny much until maybe a couple years ago
>>8221618
Yeah. I don't think they always mean exactly what they say but I think most of them have genuine problems with women. And even if they don't it's an extremely stale and boring form of shitposting anyway. One can rustle female/feminist jimmies in creative ways but almost no one bothers to.
>>8221645
what a qt
>>8221539
Shut up roastie cunt
>>8221648
They invade every private club we have. At least online they cannot threaten us with false rape accusations.
>>8221648
>One can rustle female/feminist jimmies in creative ways
We don't want to rustle any jimmies. We just want to discuss things we hate.
>>8221453
Schopenhauer and Nietzsche actually thought some women were better than even great men, but they thought the majority of both went the other way. You can only really use them as "pro-male, anti-women" if you want to consign yourself to mediocrity, and that is something both Schopenhauer and Nietzsche would find more incurable than women. Weininger is kind of hit or miss, because he thinks women are better than jews.
Rodgers is great for discussion because /lit/ has actually read him, and it's not much edgier than any other book we'd recommend to /r9k/. It's funny too, but limiting it to just people who hate women would probably make people laugh less; we'd just wind up with I'm Eliot threads instead of I'm Undergroundman threads if we popularised it.
What we should really do is give them the women authors they'd like, so they might understand Schoppy or Nietz's positions on women: OP try Esther Vilar, this picrelated qt, the author of The Manipulated Man.
Now, since we've a women writers thread going: /r/ing the pics of Zurn wrapped in thread
I'm down with this. Don't forget Alain Soral's essay, Vers la feminisation.
It would need to be fairly democratic though. I don't want one guy mandating what we read, except maybe when it comes to classics and real literature.
Here you go, anon. Love Zurn.
>>8221715
thanks <3 your twisted ass anonkun
>>8221709
Yeah. but how to organize it? As you see the thread got hijacked by people who argue for female quotas in misogyny threads eg
> give them the women authors they'd like
Sometimes I feel the only option to escape women is by opting out of society entirely. I'm thinking of a log hut in northern Norway. We'll see. Or for the really dedicated an online forum that requires passport confirmation (although females would still smuggle their way in by using the passports of their feminist male allies). There is no escape from them.
who the fuck would do this lmfao the female race is truly depraved
>>8221109
Clarice who exactly?
>>8221740
>>give them the women authors they'd like
>my misogyny should make me immune to trolling
kek, no brother. Vilar is an easier read than the suggested works, and much more relevant to the particularly of women's behaviour in the current world, post-feminism. I'm recommending her because she'll help you /r9k/ better, without having to argue with people who read Nietzsche and Schopenhauer after the Greeks and Kant who will point out the flaws in your philosophy from within the philosophers you've chosen.
If you want to avoid women who would strengthen your position, and to rely on philosophers whose soulless and autistic followers will rip you to shreds in languages you don't understand so much as "hello" in, that's up to you. It seems like a bitch move to me, but that's all perspective. If your goal with this thread is to find a way to avoid women, literature or a log hut in NorwayGrowth of the Soilaren't the answer: go work on an oil rig because they won't let women on because of rape lawsuit potential.
Hey anon that is posting all these Japanese authors, could you tell me what's a good entry level Japanese novel?
I'm trying to pick up the language.
>>8221740
You already don't have many women in your life anon. It's not like they're flocking to interact with you. You already have to go far out of your way to ever have one on one communication with a woman that's not in your family.
>>8221781
Lispector!
>>8221798
Meaning you're reading in Japanese? What level are you at?
>>8221740
>Sometimes I feel the only option to escape women is by opting out of society entirely.
>Sometimes I feel the only option to escape half of the worlds population, namely a necessary component of what is keeping the human race alive, is by opting out of society entirely.
Yes, yes, you're right.
>>8221804
Thank you!
>>8221808
No, not yet. I'm just starting atm, learning my first hiraganas. But for the future, I'd like to know.
>>8221090
No, it's a troll thread masquerading as a misogyny thread. The amount of replies I see on frogposting threads is what's ridiculous.
>>8221821
That's pretty far off, anon. But I'd recommend starting with children's short stories and poems. I read a lot of Michio Mado and Kenji Miyazawa early on.
