What theories of intelligence does /lit/ subscribe to when recognizing

Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 3

Anonymous
2016-06-25 01:26:50 Post No. 8204890
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: Jenna-Fischer-Feet-1986542.jpg (65 KB, 748x753) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-06-25 01:26:50 Post No. 8204890 [Report]

What theories of intelligence does /lit/ subscribe to when recognizing or ascribing psuedo-intellectualism in works of art or in people?

What qualities are most telling of psueds to you, or are the most annoying, and why?

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-25 01:28:15 Post No.8204895
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-25 01:28:15 Post No.8204895 [Report]

I don't even know anymore, everything seems ironic to me

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-25 01:40:35 Post No.8204912
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-25 01:40:35 Post No.8204912 [Report]

I think it's when you get older and realize in a certain way that we are all a little bit The Bassoon King

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-25 01:42:26 Post No.8204917
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-06-25 01:42:26 Post No.8204917 [Report]

File: 5Y5sMml.jpg (40 KB, 306x306) Image search: [Google]

40 KB, 306x306

>>8204895
this

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-25 02:10:49 Post No.8204974
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-06-25 02:10:49 Post No.8204974 [Report]

File: 1464394880659.gif (993 KB, 250x250) Image search: [Google]

993 KB, 250x250

So, lit studies philosophers but not psychological theories on intelligence?