Who here likes this book? Any thoughts on it?
>>8196648
reported
>>8196656
Newfag, I probably fucked up in some way. Any recommendations?
>>8196667
yeah, read zizek
>>8196648
it was too slow for me.
the movie is such a tragedy because it has simultaneously the worst acting and the best editing hollywood has seen in years.
>>8198165
I really enjoyed the movie. It was interesting to see the same character played by different actors in different centuries.
>>8198165
That asian chick in whiteface at the end made me understand why Down Syndrome used to be called "Mongoloidism".
>>8198279
because it's funny
>>8196648
I quite enjoyed it, though lit really hates it. I think it does a good job at what it tries to do. All six genres/ writing types are interesting and the connections between them aren't unbelievable. The reincarnation idea is a bit campy for some but I think it was fine.
In terms of who I liked the most, I massively enjoyed Frobisher, with my rough order of operations being.
Frob>Somni>Cavendish>Luisa/Ewing>Zacharey(or however you spell that)
I'm currently reading The Bone Clocks, which is very similar. Not sure what I think yet.
>>8198248
that was cool, they just did a kooky job.
i still enjoyed the movie immensely, just had to ignore the bad acting
>>8198426
I can understand. Tom Hanks is kind of flat.