Represent a 4chan board with a major author
>/tv/
>/d/
/lit/ is all the faces DFW makes on that German interview.
>/r9k
>>8180307
who is she
I have written so many books.
>>8180317
that's my girlfriend, michelle houellebecq
>>8180341
board?
/fit/
/pol/
>>8181115
no way, /pol/ is the literary equivalent of a 70 year old sweaty man that posts hate speech on his facebook that absolutely nobody reads and then shits himself while masturbating
>>8181130
so you?
>>8181134
#####rekgt
>>8181130
>hate speech
>>8181177
free spiich xD how can there be hate speech if free is subjeggiv
>>8181130
>hate speech
There's no such thing.
>>8181130
Hate speech is just code for free speech I don't like.
>/fa/
>>8181294
Who tf is that?
>>8181305
Brett Easton Edgelord
>>8181130
>hate speech
what the fuck is hate speech
>>8180294
literally lit
/sp/
>>8180307
No, he doesn't represent the board. There are not discussions on /r9k/ that come close to any /lit/ figure.
They are sad and angry teens, and they enjoy their pain, are reflected and so couldn't see that - this they might share with him. But they ignore anything that's longer than 3 sentences.
>>8181093
Is this real or staged?
>>8181093
is this real
>>8181541
Everything's wrong with that phrase. Who decides what is hate and which hate is OK and which is not?
Can I hate on spinach? Can I hate on Microsoft? Yes? So who gets to choose what I can or can't hate on?
Can I hate on pedos? Yes?
Can I hate on the French?
Can I hate on Mexicans? But if I'm European, can I now? No? What if I'm Mexican myself, can I hate on my own?
"Hate speech" is one of those many bullshit terms used to force you not to use arguments. It's the same thing Nazis did with racial slurs (two can play at this game).
>homophobe
>sexist
>racist
>hate speech
Any of these and more are red flags signifying that you are speaking with an irrational person who is trying to shortcut any logical conversation to impose their political agenda, which they know to be weak.
/lgbt/
>>8181955
>is this real
real as in is the knife really in his guts?
no
real as in did he really pose like that?
yes
>>8181294
more like /b/
>>8181962
what a faggot lmao
>>8181093
wrong he's /b
>>8181957
I get you, anon. But you have to admit: stuff like this makes sense in a purely logical way, but it ignores common sense.
It's "hate speech" for an Alabaman man who calls a black person a nigger because there's enough context behind that sort of interaction that everyone who isn't either a contrarian or tacitly in favor of using the word can acknowledge what's going on.
Ultimately some things come down to common sense. Pointing out logical flaws with this, and semantic contradictions, etc., just gets a little sophistic. I mean, wouldn't you agree that you know it when you see it?
I'll concede that whether or not we should form policy based on this is a different argument.
