Which one do I start with and why?
Bonus question: Which one's your favorite?
>>8164801
>being a liberal cuckold
fuck you. You don't belong here. We're redpilled
>muh equality
FUCK RIGHT OFF
>>8164809
No, we're Marxist.
>>8164801
>Bonus question: Which one's your favorite?
Neither. Modern political debates a pseudo-problem shit.
Return to Aristotle.
>>8164801
Start nowhere.
Rawls - muh Kantian veil of ignorance
Nozick - muh I'm rich and rely on the police but owe less to society than poor people for some reason
>>8164812
Marxists are mentally ill
no you
>>8164823
Capitalist wagecucks have fetal alcohol syndrome.
>>8164843
>"CAPITALISM IS BAD, GUIS, I SWEAR ON MY BERNOUT WREATH!"
t. written from my iPhone
>>8164801
start with nozick and get that shit out of the way quick
rawls can be slow going but the theory itself is solidcuck
>>8164801
Start with Rawls - it's the cornerstone of modern political philosophy.
The Nozick book is one of the better attempts to make sense of right-libertarianism, and it's more of an academic novelty item for that reason.
>>8164801
Much of ASaU is a response to ToJ, so read ToJ first.
