ITT NON-FICTION books that you think:
1) Are "good"
2) Noone else as read
Feel free to ask other posters about the book if you see something you like.
>as
has
>>8159425
Marxism is retarded. Take the redpill
>>8159435
This desu
Arthur Conan Doyle's Boer War and Crime of the Congo are both solid and public domain.
The Black Jacobins was excellent, and pretty red too for you faggot.
Churchill's Marlborough, His life and Times
>>8159435
>>8159439
I agree with both of you.
Exchange value not "containing an atom" of use value? Falling rates of profit as organic compomemts increase? It's whacked, the entire shit.
Which is precisely why I enjoyed the book, the labour theory of value is a very heterodox idea today, hell I even approached the book with the same skeptical interest I took to read about alchemy.
I came out of the book with the same opinion of Marxian economics as shit, but atleast it helped me see the logic in what was otherwise a stream of whatisthisniggersmoking.
>>8159439
Fannies, history completely slipped my mind.
oh well I guess that's welcome her too, never got what you fellows enjoy so much though, wouldn't you rather read about concepts than people?
Reaching & Teaching Students in Poverty by Paul C Gorski
Anything by that guy kicks education ass
>>8159435
The Labor Theory of Value came originally from classical liberalism
>>8159508
What a mature position
Why are you here
>>8159534
What's it about?
