Why do we pretend he's better than Ayn Rand? Because he said the same thing first or because he was a man?
>>8148415
They both are shitty reactionists.
>>8148453
Pretty sure it's reactionary, not reactionist. And don't be rude.
>>8148415
>said the same thing
>>8148415
>Why do we pretend he's better than Ayn Rand?
Because Rand tried to reconcile egoism with the spook that is 'society'.
>>8148415
I bet you didn't read either of them.
Rand's philosophy is a spook. The idea that you should put yourself before everyone and everything will force you to do thinks you wouldn't normally do making it a classic spook.
Also her philosophy is class "objectivism." How do you justify putting yourself above everything when you accept things as objective? she does it by saying society as a whole will benefit, which means her justification is just another spook. Stirner takes Descartes' idea and it is easy to see justify egotism if you are the only thing you can be sure of.
Good b8 if b8.
>>8148464
Are you trying to supress my Ego brah?!?
>>8148484
>is the concept ego a spook
>2016
>Not believing in total recourse
>In other words, not being a reactionary.
>>8149835
>wanting to be associated with the alt right community
>>8149851
>alt right community
>not alt right meme
Ayn Rand's philosophy orbits around property rights, Stirner's philosophy attacks property rights as interfering with self-orbit. They are both egoists, but Ayn Rand says the egoism of others must be respected, whereas Stirner says that is incompatible with true egoism, which respects nothing save itself.
>>8150244
What if your property is a milk shop?
Because Rand is retarded and thinks everyone /must/ act in what she thinks is their self-interest, namely becoming a billionaire aka subordinating your ego to the spook of capital accumulation.
Also people who believe Stirner is a reactionary need to learn to read.
Daily reminder nihilism is reactionary.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DO02IEqvN8
>>8150601
Nihilism is the only philosophy that isn't reactionary. Egoism is I above all else. Everything else interacts with 'all else' before determining what 'I' is.
