>November 8
Who else hype?
>>8124330
My NYRB subscription is a treasure, I download like 10 books after every edition.
>>8124330
>translated by
zero hype
>>8124330
I read it in French. Bresson is mostly a fraud with some great editing skills.
His philosophy on cinema is kind of interesting but mostly just DUDE JUST WING IT LMAO inspirations.
Many of his films are unwatchable. A shame he had to force his theory of acting on audiences.
Reminder that Bresson thought nearly every film was shit except random James Bond and Lean Brothers films.
He would go around saying he hadn't finished watching a film in decades.
>>8124586
That's what happens when you're alone at the top.
>>8124586
is there a source for this?
read this on a free pdf i found on google a few years ago
why would i pay some new york hipster book press for it let alone be 'hype'
the notes are just that by the way - notes
who doesn't love bresson but then who wants to read all his goofy airhead explanations for techniques that can be explained in much more pragmatic and unpretentious ways
btw
diary of a country priest > au hasard > a gentle woman > largent > pickpocket > mouchette > four nights a dreamer > a man escaped > the process of jeannedarc > anges du peche > the devil probably > dames de bois de bolognese> lancelot du lake
>>8124742
Yes. Read more.
>>8124781
mouchette is his best
>>8124801
What was the purpose of this shot?
>>8124817
you just don't 'get' pure cinema
go watch some bergman filmed theatre, facking plebo
>>8124826
I do not understand what purpose that shot served within the sequence and the film as a whole. Do you have any ideas?
